>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Accessories
> 660 or 662? k750i
Bookmark topic
well, still liked the 660 better, cause it looks more clean and doesnt stand out as much as the 662, the 662 had rubber over the stick wich was nice, but still, the 660 looks better imho. But the 662 has bt 1.2 (if thats any good i dont know) and is a new model...
Hmm, kinda hard to choose between those.
--
Posted: 2005-06-12 02:47:44
Edit :
Quote
As I say the looks are entirely subjective.
If you prefer the look of the 660 then I would go for that - the point I made in my last post was that in testing I have noticed absolutely no benefits in use of the 662 over the 660 (apart from the call timer which IMO is hardly a big deal). I guess the 660 can be picked up somehwat cheaper then the 662 being an older model too.
Also note that contrary to some of the misinformation about on some forums the 660 is no different to the 662 in its ability to display called id names from your phonebook rather than just a number when used with phones correctly supporting the handsfree profile (ie both the 660 and 662 both do this).
[ This Message was edited by: SL33PYH34D on 2005-06-12 02:51 ]
--
Posted: 2005-06-12 03:51:36
Edit :
Quote
Hey, nice review!
Does the 662 has a backlit screen? Is the screen readable at night?
OMG, I can't decide, HBH-662 or BT800?
Ebay (cheaper but maybe no warranty) or Local store (more expensive and normal "warranty")???
--
Posted: 2005-06-12 16:53:12
Edit :
Quote
just bought the 662, just because its the newest, and i think its only in my head where i belive the 660 is better looking, many others says that the black is stylish and all that. In the end, who cares really. the diffrence isnt that much, and as a tech freak iam, i want the newest.
Dont buy the jabra 800 (imho), It was really plastic and had som glitches in the construction. atleast the one i got my hands on in the phone store. it looks nice on picture on the net. but seeing it irl, well. One glance at it and take it in my hand once was enough to choose a SE model instead. 662 is good. 660 still looks a little better (my head only maybe) but im a tech freak and wants the newest. so i bought the newest.
only diffrence from 662 and 660 is that its bt 1.2 in 662 and 1.1 in 660. Dont know the diffrences with 1.1 and 1.2, read somewhere that maybe bt 1.2 is not interfering so much with wifi and other wireless communication. BLAH dont care =) 660 better looking, 662 newer, and more rubber on the stick then 660.
--
Posted: 2005-06-12 19:58:53
Edit :
Quote
l have both the 660 and the 662, l don't see very many differences between both of them exept for the call timer on the 662 after an outgoing call or incomming the headset displays the call duration and the sound quality of the 660 sounds a lot better. i'ts up to you what to get. both have the same battery life from what l can see until now.
--
Posted: 2005-06-12 23:10:34
Edit :
Quote
hmm, better sound in 660, gonna see if i can get my hands on a 660 and compare it.
--
Posted: 2005-06-13 01:15:04
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-06-13 01:15:04, libben wrote:
hmm, better sound in 660, gonna see if i can get my hands on a 660 and compare it.
Can't see why this would ever be the case - they are basically the same headset, with the same hardware. Only real difference appears to be firmware and personally I noticed no difference in sound quality between the two.
--
Posted: 2005-06-13 03:10:04
Edit :
Quote
can anyone point me to a step by step guide on hooking my 662 to the pc, ive managed to pair it to the pc with the security menu and entered the code. but i cant find any services avaible in the "my bluetooths places" do i need to update any driver to get it like a michrophone? I wanna use skype with it on my pc.
--
Posted: 2005-06-13 07:06:53
Edit :
Quote
I'm using a HBH-660 at the moment with my K750i and I'm going to have to replace it with a 662. Why? Well the 660 interferes with my 56g WiFi network. And I know the 662 gets around this issue...
--
Posted: 2005-07-17 22:15:11
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
