>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902
Bookmark topic
What about C702, anyone tried Pictures with that?
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 19:35:10
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-22 14:21:32, k850 successor wrote:
you are hillarious
Do you think that you can put a big sensor in a 10 mm phone? if you think so, then there is something wrong with you
K770i is the same form factor and thickness as the C902, is a Cybershot, and takes superior pictures to the K800i. FACT.
Thickness has nothing to do with picture quality - technology moves on and things get smaller. Picture quality is also highly-dependent on post-processing which is done by the software.
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 11:57:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-23 11:57:33, dualist wrote:
On 2008-05-22 14:21:32, k850 successor wrote:
you are hillarious
Do you think that you can put a big sensor in a 10 mm phone? if you think so, then there is something wrong with you
K770i is the same form factor and thickness as the C902, is a Cybershot, and takes superior pictures to the K800i. FACT.
Thickness has nothing to do with picture quality - technology moves on and things get smaller. Picture quality is also highly-dependent on post-processing which is done by the software.
i think you don't know what you are talking about: k770 is 14 mm thick and it does NOT take better pics than k800 !
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 14:25:51
Edit :
Quote
there's certain thickness limitation for camera module
the higher the resolution, the thicker.... i am not going to touch the detail
i makes me wonder how to squeeze a 5mpx sensor into 10mm phone.
not surprised something is sacrifies in term of chip set and memory size (as buffer etc etc) in order to get it done
we need to know what Sonyericsson target audience for such product...it could be for the fashion savvy....even you look at sony cybershot...they have the T series , W series, H series, alpha series.... why can't sonyericsson make phone tht come with different camera quality and different target audience. C9xx might suggest you it will offer superd quality in picture but why can't it be a product tht just mean to look cool and offer camera quality tht is good enough.
then it might have other cybershot phone tht look thicker or less appealing but with great camera spec.
but no doubt SE seem to be loosing their steam in making great camera phone. I hope they just don't make a very ugly looking phone....for nokia i think I can only accept n73 or n85 as phone tht look nice.
many new offering just look weird.
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 08:42:07
Edit :
Quote
K770i ... takes superior pictures to the K800i. FACT.
are you insane? you don't know too much about K800 camera. place for your FACT is between fairy tales
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 09:11:00
Edit :
Quote
no his just crazy....And he just says that because he haves a k770.Let him dream
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 10:16:50
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-23 11:57:33, dualist wrote:
K770i is the same form factor and thickness as the C902, is a Cybershot, and takes superior pictures to the K800i. FACT.
Not FACT but OPINION! But I agree. I prefer the less processed, more natural photos from the K770 compared to the overdone sharpening you see in K800 photos.
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 10:38:59
Edit :
Quote
overdone sharpening? well... i... uhm... what?
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 14:30:50
Edit :
Quote
Well things are made there ... is as simple to say that the Nokia 6220 is better than SE .. since it has flash xeṇn osea with that more quality photos .. at night .. and also the screen is 0.2 inches bigger ... and has GPS ... inportantes are points that a consumer could not Jarl of .. so that the Nokia 6220 wins!
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: single_luis on 2008-05-26 14:44 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 15:44:16
Edit :
Quote
We haven’t got the C902 but already talking about the next firmware release……. How pathetic that. After P990i I don’t buy the firmware things. If some phone is capable to something then it capable from start like K800, K810, W850 etc not the P990i, K850i etc.
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 19:03:29
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
