>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> wich cam is better? K700 or 6230?
Bookmark topic
100th post
--
Posted: 2004-11-23 01:27:43
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-11-22 12:25:24, Amras wrote:
anyway, have you guys forgot the panorama mode?
it's only available in k700i.
101th POST
!
Yeah . . . the very FAMOUS - Panorama Mode in the
K700i fone . . . unfortunately, I wasn't able to USE that even a SINGLE time then, as I am having some difficulty SENDING it to my email account, will then be uploaded here in Esato's server/archive - for posting
!
--
Posted: 2004-11-23 01:51:24
Edit :
Quote
I know many will disagree but I think the panorama wasn't that good. The color quality most of the time differ in the different segments and the part where you stitch is soooo difficult to perfect.
--
Posted: 2004-11-23 01:58:34
Edit :
Quote
I think that both phones have mediocre cameras. I was a little disappointed with the k700i in the aspect that it should have had a megapixel camera on it.. vga is nice.. but it would be nice to have the ability to print a few acceptable pictures.
Also.. the k700i's camera shifts too far red when its dark or under incadescent lighting.. making people look sunburned.
This sounds negative, however I do like the camera, its a HUGE improvement over the t610/630 series and the light makes a nice flashlight.. i mean a REALLY nice flashlight.
I'd like to see a feature added in a later firmware that allows you to use the led as a flashlight with the camera off, cause it is really that good at night.
--
Posted: 2004-11-23 05:35:01
Edit :
Quote
The pic quality depends on the optics and the software of that particular phone and the k700i has a better camera then any other nokia in its class imo
--
Posted: 2004-11-23 06:04:36
Edit :
Quote
@vineet, do you think it's still possible to improve the camera output of the K700i by a firmware upgrade? The noise on the poor lighting could really use some help, that way K700i will be the best overall - day or night!
--
Posted: 2004-11-24 03:15:54
Edit :
Quote
daytime, the k700i is EXCELLENT. But night the colors shift and theres lots of noise.
I think.. a firmware upgrade could help color correction, and allow it to fire quicker. Digital zoom could possibly be improved too.
--
Posted: 2004-11-25 00:01:50
Edit :
Quote
I think there's not much improvement that can be expected from digital zoom as it's just artificial zooming. An external zoom lens perhaps.
--
Posted: 2004-11-25 02:11:53
Edit :
Quote
I meant.. as in like quality of the digital zoom, that its more precise on tracking the picture so you don't get blur as easy.
--
Posted: 2004-11-26 07:50:14
Edit :
Quote
I bought my a K700i the other day. Here is my impressions now (compared to the 6230 which I have own for 6 months now)
Quote:
On 2004-11-21 22:14:27, TheRealSpawn wrote:
the 6230 takes better pictures in poor lightingconditions - while the k700 takes the best pictures under optimum lightingconditions.
Yes, but one could ask himself what are optimum lightingconditions. I just took a couple of pictures in a major department store (Yes, they are well lit) and the images got these anyoing grainy parts in it. It seems that the 6230 camera whoops the k700 cam in every area, but outside and light conditions.
Quote:
About videorecording - you are talking nonsense - the nokia 6230 records video at maximum resolution of 128x96 at 12fps and max 4minuttes - the K700 records video at resolution 176x144 at 15fps and up to 40 minuttes (or up to available memory)
When looking at these figures it may appear that the K700's superior resolution compared to nokias 128x96 and the supposed higher framerate would whoop Nokias (6230) ass, but it really doesn't. The compression artifacts (big squares) and the slow update rate on the k700 makes it almost impossible to see what has actually been recorded! The nokia has a lower resolution, I give you that, but you can actually see whats been recorded when looking at a Nokia 3gp-movie. Even when setting the K700 to the lower resolution, the artifacts remain and makes the movie-recording suck. I will post a few examples, where you can clearly see the difference later on
Quote:
Furthermore when it comes to playback of video - the nokia only play video at 128x96 pixels 12fps with very very poor AMR audio and max total bitrate of 90kbit/s - while the K700 can play video at 176x144 pixels 15fps with highquality AAC stereroaudio and max total bitrate of 160kbit/s which makes for instance musicvideos (and everything else) alot more interesting on K700 than on 6230
Yes, here I totally agree with you, The K700 is better to view video on, Nokia has nothing to put up here...
--
Posted: 2004-11-29 14:26:22
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
