Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Have Sony Ericsson finally taken the lead in global mobile phone solutions?
Index Menu
Sign in
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Have Sony Ericsson finally taken the lead in global mobile phone solutions? Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 141516 ... 373839>

DragonEye Posts: > 500

Quote:


this is not the point in discussion. issue is whether K750i/W800 is so revolutionary that it will elevates SE to top-notch.

to me K750/W800 is so rudimentary that it does not even come close to something like 6680/6630/XphoneII/MotoE680.


[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2005-03-10 15:28 ]


from a general phone perspective i would have to say yes...

2.0 cam, basic UI, mp3, size, screen..makes it the top of its' class for a "dumb phone"

there are no "dumb phones" that can match SE in this area yet...with regards to balance in style and performance and specs.

we've got a v635 and 6230i in the works at best

for example you can give this phone to my grandma and see can figure out how to take pics, makes a call and listen to music...

you give a series 60 smartphone and 80 apps for her and she'll throw the phone and me out the window..

series 60 is a very advanced OS but may be too much for some users.




_________________
Shaolinmonk on HOFO Official PHONE JUNKIE
MyProfile http://www.howardforums.com/m[....]s=&action=getinfo&userid=20841

[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2005-03-10 15:34 ]
--
Posted: 2005-03-10 16:32:57
Edit : Quote

mib1800 Posts: > 500

@scotsboyuk

so r u saying that SE K750/W800 is like the space shuttle? this is flaw analogy. firstly SE is not a monopoly of certain technology which no one has. the K750/W800 does not any technology that has not been used before. So what is so revolutionary about these 2 phones?
--
Posted: 2005-03-10 16:39:49
Edit : Quote

phsychomantis Posts: 146

Lets just hope that SE's market rate doesnt drops further as for pseries there were many factors for pulling out royalty was one of them This message was posted from a T230
--
Posted: 2005-03-10 16:40:22
Edit : Quote

mib1800 Posts: > 500

@scotsboyuk
Quote: there are no "dumb phones" that can match SE in this area yet...with regards to balance in style and performance and specs.

we've got a v635 and 6230i in the works at best

for example you can give this phone to my grandma and see can figure out how to take pics, makes a call and listen to music...

you give a series 60 smartphone and 80 apps for her and she'll throw the phone and me out the window..


i think u r trying to do selective comparison of K750 technology. Compared to a 6230i, K750 would be superior. But you cannot just benchmark K750 against a lower grade phone and declare it as an indication that SE technology is "advanced".


--
Posted: 2005-03-10 16:50:01
Edit : Quote

kooki Posts: 381

1 question
why was it that nokia was not even nominated for 3gsm???
--
Posted: 2005-03-10 16:52:05
Edit : Quote

goldenface Posts: > 500

@phsychomantis. I think you missed a post

Quote:
On 2005-03-10 15:38:24, Arne Anka wrote:
@phsychomantis

SE do not pay any licence fees to Nokia. UIQ is not owned by Nokia and neither is Symbian. Looking at the ownership of Symbian, Nokia is the largest owner. But have not own majority. All manufacturers (Nokia, SE, Samsung etc.) using Symbian pay licence fees to Symbian (not Nokia) and the amount is equal for everybody.

http://www.symbian.com/about/ownership.html


[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2005-03-10 14:40 ]

--
Posted: 2005-03-10 16:54:18
Edit : Quote

DragonEye Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2005-03-10 16:50:01, mib1800 wrote:
@scotsboyuk
Quote: there are no "dumb phones" that can match SE in this area yet...with regards to balance in style and performance and specs.

we've got a v635 and 6230i in the works at best

for example you can give this phone to my grandma and see can figure out how to take pics, makes a call and listen to music...

you give a series 60 smartphone and 80 apps for her and she'll throw the phone and me out the window..


i think u r trying to do selective comparison of K750 technology. Compared to a 6230i, K750 would be superior. But you cannot just benchmark K750 against a lower grade phone and declare it as an indication that SE technology is "advanced".



that was posted by me....

sure you can... you can't just lump everything together..
becasue there is a target market that SE/nokia has identified

i can think of many reasons why a regular SE is more advanced then series 60 and UIQ....

better battery = more advanced tech
simplified menu offering = soemthing that can dumb it down for people can be considered advanced.
smaller form factor = abilty to put more in something smaller can be considered more advanced.

at the end of the day series 60 /uiq is merely more custimizeable not nescesarily advanced.

what can a series 60 phone do that these new SE's can't?









_________________
Shaolinmonk on HOFO Official PHONE JUNKIE
MyProfile http://www.howardforums.com/m[....]s=&action=getinfo&userid=20841

[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2005-03-10 16:01 ]
--
Posted: 2005-03-10 16:56:28
Edit : Quote

goldenface Posts: > 500

@mib1800. What Scotty is simply saying is just because one thing doesn't sell as much as another doesn't mean it is less advanced.
--
Posted: 2005-03-10 16:58:22
Edit : Quote

batesie Posts: > 500

exactly, there are more fords made than mercedes, but it doesnt make them more advanced.

Nokia is the BULK producer of the mobile world.
Sony Ericsson is the QUALITY producer of the mobile world.
--
Posted: 2005-03-10 17:02:30
Edit : Quote

kooki Posts: 381

@mib can u ans my question too........
if they were nominated, then why have they not won!!!

quality vs quantity
--
Posted: 2005-03-10 17:06:22
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 141516 ... 373839>
New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home