>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SE should use Carl Zeiss lenses!
Bookmark topic
I dont think the sharp name is popular...
Samsung, nokia and se imo are the top 3 phone manufacturers atm so if one of these launch a higher spec cam it will instantly be welcomed in the market!!
I think
is making a 3.2 mp cam for the K800... check the "se high end phones" thread in rumours....
--
Posted: 2006-02-03 09:38:03
Edit :
Quote
It's pitty for the Sharp 903SH. I didn't know for existing such a phone with 3,2Mps and so many features.
Perhaps here is again a word for the brand name - Sharp is not Sony. I mean - if Sharp makes a phone camera with 4Mp it will haven't the same market success, as if Sony releases a phone camera with 2,5 - 3 Mps.
Perhaps I'm addicted to Sony brand and I'm not so objective, but for me Sony means proven and tested high technologies, high quality built construction, longlasting, risk-free. With one word - more expencive, but worth.
--
Posted: 2006-02-03 09:43:39
Edit :
Quote
I also believe that from the release of the W800 with SONY "W" branding
will be a very good competitor in the mobile markets!!
All SONY has to do now is add the CYBERSHOT name to a
phone and SAMSUNG and nokia will be in a lot of trouble!!!
--
Posted: 2006-02-03 09:55:13
Edit :
Quote
Yes, 786KBR
you are right! And to remove the name Ericsson
I wonder why shuch a giant as Sony would co-operate with a small and previous unknown company and would share it's brand name??
--
Posted: 2006-02-03 10:02:30
Edit :
Quote
Woah hold up guy... Ericsson plays just as bigger part a SONY does...
Ericsson is an asset to
they work well together...
But to bring out confused consumers SONYs branding just adds that little bit extra...
--
Posted: 2006-02-03 10:16:10
Edit :
Quote
Actualy it's the other way around:Ericsson is the big name here, while Sony was bringing in the money as they needed a bridge head in the mobile market. Get ur facts straight,it'll help u in the future. As for the CZ lenses,it's a marketing gimmick!
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2006-02-03 18:49:33
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-02-03 18:49:33, 701 wrote:
Actualy it's the other way around:Ericsson is the big name here, while Sony was bringing in the money as they needed a bridge head in the mobile market. Get ur facts straight,it'll help u in the future. As for the CZ lenses,it's a marketing gimmick!
This message was posted from a WAP device
Really???? Is the Ericsson name selling the phones?? They both cant do without eachother at this point in time...
marketing is all
needs... personally thats what I think is selling Nokias and Samsungs...
--
Posted: 2006-02-04 08:34:50
Edit :
Quote
I believe sony actually own "carl zeiss" now anyway ...
But the main factors in the lack of quality in phone cameras is the CCD/CMOS and the len size rather than the quality...
A phonecam lens is so small and the CCD/CMOS is similarly small that makes fitting a CZ lens insignificant...
Nokia phone uses them and pics aren't brilliant..
Its down to the electronics/processing and size to let light in rather than overall quality.
Doesn't really matter too much
--
Posted: 2006-02-05 01:25:22
Edit :
Quote
@optiplex:
does have a 3.2MP phone out, just not for your market...
@roumen68: "small and previous unknown company" are you being sarcastic or ironic here? If not then wtf??? \\o/
Who do you think makes the stations and provides the equipment for/to the networks?
Who do you think makes the hw and sw platforms for most of the mobile phone manufacturers?
Ericsson
///
--
Posted: 2006-02-05 02:12:45
Edit :
Quote
@S4k1s,
Sorry, I see you are from Sweden. Maybe Ericsson was a quite popular company there before the joint with Sony, but I really didn't heard it's name before.
--
Posted: 2006-02-05 06:55:24
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
