News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > The Sony Ericsson K800i is currently the best camera phone. Bookmark topic

are you sure K800 is the best camera phone... wait.. i think they missed out one main important phone... Sharp 903 3.2MP with 2X optical zoom.




--
Posted: 2006-08-15 09:41:22
Edit : Quote


The N73 performed very poorly in low light. Useless in that aspect.
--
Posted: 2006-08-15 10:08:10
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-08-15 09:41:22, 02 wrote:
are you sure K800 is the best camera phone... wait.. i think they missed out one main important phone... Sharp 903 3.2MP with 2X optical zoom.


Its too clumsy and beside good daylight pictures it has not much other things that goes for it to be called the best camera phone.
--
Posted: 2006-08-15 11:36:02
Edit : Quote


903 is not worldwide phone,only on vodafone networks,that is the reason! This message was posted from a K750
--
Posted: 2006-08-15 11:40:16
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-08-14 23:32:01, victorh017 wrote:
And I'm actually amazed that the LG performed so poorly, considering it is a 5MP camera phone... Nice try LG



I agree. i was shocked that LG managed to bring out a 5MP camera phone with 4x optical zoom but then when i read up on it i was extremely dissappointed to find many problems with the phone capabilities.

Here's a site for more info about the KG920:
http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/6931.html
--
Posted: 2006-08-15 15:08:40
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-08-14 15:49:02, Residentevil wrote:
SE rulez, Nokia drools.



Thats my name dont wear it out!!!

Cheers
--
Posted: 2006-08-15 15:53:45
Edit : Quote


i am just waiting for the SE announcement of their vdo phone sooon
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 19:57:28
Edit : Quote


When I was out and about today I must of seen at least 3 K800I being used in town, they are everywhere. Because they are great phones and much eaiser to use then Nokia's series 60. And if you compare the N73 next to the K800I in a shop, the K800I is a far bit smaller and better built. In my view the Nokia feels far to plasticy.
It was bound to win in that test as Sony have there Cybershot department resources to pull from, where as Nokia has to try on it's own. And as for the LG, goes to show higher Mega pixel count doesn't mean better pictures.
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 21:29:42
Edit : Quote


Definately not, from the picture samples that i have seen on gsm arena the nokia n73 has a better cam than the k800, the n73 showed better, clearer, smother more refine pics than the k800 and D900. This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2006-08-17 03:52:32
Edit : Quote


Well the N73 is newer than the K800 therefore it wouldn't be surprising if it had better picture quality. What i'm starting to wonder is why people bother with needing such a good camera on their cell phones when a middle classed camera could do much more than a camera on cell phones also it's probably cheaper than the cell phone. Sure it is convenient to have both combined into one, but how often do people need such high quality pictures? if you know you're going to be taking pictures then wouldn't it make more sense to bring a higher quality camera? something of 5-8 MP or higher? and if it's just for 'normal' pictures, do we really need something that good?
So why not but a middle classed camera as well as a sturdy and reliable phone without camera capability? it would probably cost less than buying those phones with 3+ MP etc. On top of that, some places ban the use of camera phones.
Just a random thought...
--
Posted: 2006-08-17 05:20:50
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index