>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902
Bookmark topic
woow...
worst 5MP pictures i have ever seen... WORST.... WORST...
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:01:15
Edit :
Quote
Apparently you should disable Face detection when not taking a photo of a face! Possibly affecting the sharpness of the pics? Obviously not the colours tho...
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:07:08
Edit :
Quote
emm.
what about this:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=rec&w=all&q=c902&m=text
photos are unfortunatly 800x600 but the color reproduction is way better than the comparison shots with the 6220
i don't get it... is the comparison is a HEAVILY baised one.... or was their C902 an Early early faulty prototype.... or....
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:10:37
Edit :
Quote
The words "style over substance" come to mind.
SE really need to step-up, I love my W890i but this would make me buy a Nokia.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:14:33
Edit :
Quote
Phone-wise, I dunno what's disappointed me more recently: the rumoured
P5 apparently having the same ol' 208MHz CPU, or seeing how crap these C902 pics are...
_________________
He who laughs last...thinks slowest.
P1i, Nokia 7600
[ This Message was edited by: amawanqa on 2008-05-19 19:19 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2008-05-22 00:59 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:18:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-19 20:10:37, chombos1 wrote:
emm.
what about this:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=rec&w=all&q=c902&m=text
photos are unfortunatly 800x600 but the color reproduction is way better than the comparison shots with the 6220
i don't get it... is the comparison is a HEAVILY baised one.... or was their C902 an Early early faulty prototype.... or....
Guys! That's what I've been telling you about! See the above pictures and you'll notice that the colours are nigh-perfect with the new firmware.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:24:30
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-19 20:10:37, chombos1 wrote:
emm.
what about this:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=rec&w=all&q=c902&m=text
photos are unfortunatly 800x600 but the color reproduction is way better than the comparison shots with the 6220
i don't get it... is the comparison is a HEAVILY baised one.... or was their C902 an Early early faulty prototype.... or....
Without any comparison, you can not judge those pics.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:27:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-19 20:27:19, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-05-19 20:10:37, chombos1 wrote:
emm.
what about this:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?s=rec&w=all&q=c902&m=text
photos are unfortunatly 800x600 but the color reproduction is way better than the comparison shots with the 6220
i don't get it... is the comparison is a HEAVILY baised one.... or was their C902 an Early early faulty prototype.... or....
Without any comparison, you can not judge those pics.
you're right.... i'am just comparing the color reproduction.... C902 is still far away from being a Cyber-shot High ender.
[ This Message was edited by: chombos1 on 2008-05-19 19:31 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:30:41
Edit :
Quote
These pics were obviously taken with a pre-release firmware and are bound to be poor. New firmware will inevitably improve the camera quality, as it always does with SE phones - there's no debating that.
The bitching in this thread is meaningless - if you recall, the quality of the photos in the K800i pre-release firmware was equally bad. We just need to be patient for a few months' for SE to perfect their camera drivers.
The only real topic worthy of discussion is why SE can't get their software right before launching new handsets, rather than their current model of releasing shabby firmware and effectively using their customer to beta-test the bugs out of it.
[ This Message was edited by: dualist on 2008-05-19 19:42 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:41:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-19 20:41:00, dualist wrote:
We just need to be patient for a few months' for SE to perfect their camera drivers.
Yeah, and by then the 6220's successor will be out...
LOL.
--
Posted: 2008-05-19 20:44:37
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
