>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SonyEricsson or Nokia ???
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2003-01-29 07:30, crowing wrote:
nokia really has marketed the looks of their phones. where i come from you can upgrade a 3310 to 3330 or an 8210 to an 8250 which means that same hardware can carry the same software, which means no real evolution.
Which Nokia does in production anyway:
8310 6510
6610 7210
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 07:33:00
Edit :
Quote
yup, which means they are not dropping the bomb on the consumers with their line up, their just trying to pepper us with the small stuff. like when SE dropped us the t68i (which i think still has some aftershocks.) we really couldnt blame nokia, it works for them. but i guess the 7110 would be the last nokia i'll ever have.
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 07:36:00
Edit :
Quote
I used 6210 for a while but following are some of the reasons why switched back to Ericsson.
1) If you dont have a number in your phonebook, then the number appears only for few seconds on you nokia phone incase of call waiting and it changes to call2. So if you dont look at the phone screen with in a few seconds for a waiting call you do not know who is calling.
2) The "Other party call waiting" beep is so low that I used to miss it completly.
3) TechTV conducted a survay, that quite a lot of people send SMS messages to wrong numbers and end up embarassing themselves. In Nokia once you press yes to send the message there is no way to cancel it. Where as in ericsson phones you can cancel your messages while it is delivering the message.
4) In Nokia the top buttons have different functions at different times depending on where you are in the menus. So you need to always look at the screen to operate it. Where as Ericsson phones have set functions (Except for the menu key) so you can actually operate it with out looking at the phone.
5) You need to press more buttons to do anything in the nokia phone compared to Ericsson phones. For example to delete any entry in phonebook, sms list, calls list just press and hold "c".
6) Ericsson phones now have better shortcuts to different features i.e. press and hold "c" for the menu, press and hold right or left arrow for direct access to different features.
the list goes on. .....
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 15:32:00
Edit :
Quote
With the entrance of colored cell phones this year, Nokia and SE are not the only ones who should be compared already. Motorola, Samsung, Panasonic, and possibly NEC will be getting the attention from 2003 till who knows when.
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 16:06:00
Edit :
Quote
Nobody here mentiond that nokias are massd produced in china,the first models are made in finland but once demand increases they ship production to china!so do not say that because SE's are made in malaysia they are not quality,do you know that BMW awarded malaysia production rights i think 2 yrs ago?is BMW low quality?wake up to smell marketing gimmicks!here in the philippines nokias depreciate rather fast,you could get a 3310 for $35-$40.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 18:31:00
Edit :
Quote
invent T68 as a first color screen mobile inthis world
I think this is enough to prove that
is the best otherwise
why do Nokia and all other phone copy this idea, isn't it?
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 18:50:00
Edit :
Quote
Yup,nokia-higher resolution but why do the pictures look pale and transparent on their color phones???got a lot of officemates who were die-hard nokia fans who changed to SE and never regretted when they experiencd the features that are packd inside the t68,2 of them sold their 6610s after a month's time :-D
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 19:06:00
Edit :
Quote
Most of us still adore the T68 but it was only the first GSM color phone; in Japan and Korea they have had them for several years. And the new Nokia screens are better than SE's; not like GD87 or Samsung but better than T68's.It is good to be a realist.
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 19:28:00
Edit :
Quote
Just because someone invents something and therefore is first in the world doesn´t mean they´re the best now does it? If that was true The army would use blackpowder Remington rifles right?
Look at the Japanese motor industry, how did they start? Right, by shamelessly copying american cars and british motorcycles. Does that mean that you´d rather buy an old leaky Triumph with Lucas electrics than a new Honda or Yamaha?
Nokia is the undisputable leader, so they must do something right or at least something the other makers don´t, right? I´m not a one-make fan but it bugs me when people are naive and fanatic and refuse to face facts. By all means have an opinion but please respect people who has a different one (and are in majority
Cheers!
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 19:34:00
Edit :
Quote
I agree with SE
fan, Nokia is
--
Posted: 2003-01-29 19:40:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
