Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Symbian phones : Camera on P900 sucks !!
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Symbian phones > Camera on P900 sucks !! Bookmark topic
Page <  12345>

hurny Posts: 350

Man, that Lynx is empty. The other tin is Tommy Hilfigger.

Anyway, I quite like the smell of 'Africa'

I knew this would happen. We're comparing the quality, not the friggen content of the photo.
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 15:35:14
Edit : Quote

badrat_rachael Posts: 47

Quote:
On 2003-11-26 03:25:34, TooMuch2AM wrote:
@BigFeat

I was about to suggest the BT feature on cameras myself, I'd love it if my trusty digital IXUS could transfer pics wirelessly to my P900 for MMS'ing.


If you cam takes compact flash cards, get ready to be interested.

I've heard tale on the net about compact flash cards soon to be announced that have storage built in, like yer normal cf card, but also have bt ability built in.
You can get bt cf cards for pdas (though the y only add bt functionailty, no storage) - so, when these duo purpose cards come out, wouldn't it be nice if you could smack 'em in your digicam and transfer photos via bt ? I'd buy one, and my camera is a 5 million mega pixel one. Though I doubt i'd be taking full res photos with *that* to send via mms.

You can already get bt digital cameras though, so I'm told but I don't know which models or whatever.
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 15:40:59
Edit : Quote

KSE Posts: 369

I must disagree with whoever it was who said that resolution does not matter... I have yet to see decent pictures from anything less than a 2.1 megapixel camera, and even then they ain't all that brilliant... moreso if you want to blow them up to a useable size... (phones are different since you should not really be wanting to do this... which is why you will invariably need a dedicated camera to go with your phone if you are being serious)

Of course the resolution is only one aspect and needs to be properly supported by other quality components, but IMO a high resolution is a good determining factor of the quality of the rest of the wizardry (not always true of course, sine some £100ish cameras supposedly come with 3MP resolutions, but as well as resolution, I find you only usually get what you pay for anyway, so such that can be dismissed to the bargain bin)... manufacturers are not going to waste expensive and quality compnents on a low resolution camera... it just won't happen...

The above pictures from the Nokia are hideous IMO, and that is not to say that the P900 would be any better, neither produce the kind of quality that I would want to rely upon... and why people regard the integrated cameras as being heavily important for anything other than the odd snapshot is beyond me
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 15:41:08
Edit : Quote

pachy Posts: > 500

@Hurny well maybe i failed to be funny,look on the bright side, i didn't go on about some stupid rugby game like some English are at the moment.
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 15:46:37
Edit : Quote

hurny Posts: 350

Its rare for you to go unfunny.

I dont give a stuff about the rugby. Good on them for winning. The cricket team is suicidal, so its good that one discipline won something off us.
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 16:53:09
Edit : Quote

DragonEye Posts: > 500

GX-22 takes the best pics to date... for GSM

e715 takes good pics too

but if we're just talking about smartphones
followed by 6600/3650/7650
then p900
and the p800

i've compared them all...



--
Posted: 2003-11-26 17:12:00
Edit : Quote

KSE Posts: 369

Oh well done !

1) Its
2) easy
3) to
4) write
5) a
6) list...

but where are the facts to back it up my friend?
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 17:14:52
Edit : Quote

DragonEye Posts: > 500

chill bro...i can't upload.... why don't you search..just cause your hardcore SE doesn't mean you can open your mind and accept that some phones do other things better.

right now i don't have al 8 phones around but i can post a few links to pics taken by different cams... but it will be hard to compare since they're not the same shot...

but i think you'll be convinced the the gx-22 takes the best pics to date.

brb

http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=247044

here's a start you can decide for yourself... that;s just my opinion

[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2003-11-26 16:34 ]
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 17:32:19
Edit : Quote

hurny Posts: 350

I agree that the GX-22 screen looks the best out of all mobiles, but I guess the camera quality would follow.

THIS IS WHY I asked people to post pics taken direct from their P900. Pachy? Anyone? post some pics NOW!
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 17:34:55
Edit : Quote

DragonEye Posts: > 500

http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=229940&perpage=15&pagenumber=5

i know there's a few in here....

and I know you guys love him..Bengalboy
--
Posted: 2003-11-26 17:42:53
Edit : Quote
Page <  12345>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home