>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> wich cam is better? K700 or 6230?
Bookmark topic
No contest! The SE K700i is far much better than Nokia's 6230 when it comes to image/picture and screen resolution - quality !
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 14:39:14
Edit :
Quote
the 6230 is a very boring phone
the 'grid' menu system is a lame attempt by nokia to copy the SE interface
the newer phones with themes are also a copy from SE and they are pathetic!!
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 14:47:54
Edit :
Quote
for pictures k700 is better my dad has the 6230 and i have the k700 the pics on screen and comp r better from the k700!!
WAYNE ROONEY!!! WHOOOO best thing to come out of england since drum n bass
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 14:54:11
Edit :
Quote
TheRealSpawn Posts: > 500
the K700 beat the 6230 hands down in every aspect ecxept for expandable memory.
Screen: K700 176x220 pixel vs 6230 128x128 pixel - much better screen
Themesupport: K700 only !
Videorecording: K700 unlimited up to 41mb vs 6230 limited to 4mb
Videorecording: K700 176x144 pixel vs 6230 128x96 pixels
Videoplayback: K700 176x144pixel with HighQ AAC audio vs 6230 only 128x96 pixel with LowQ AMR audio
Poly: K700 40tones vs 6230 24tones
Camera: K700 fotolight vs 6230 none
Camera: K700 panoramamode vs 6230 not
Camera: K700 fun frames vs 6230 ??
Camera: Overall quality - K700 best under good lightingconditions, 6230 best under poor lightingconditions.
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 14:58:32
Edit :
Quote
wat about moto398 cam?i think the fone is great
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 15:14:43
Edit :
Quote
@therealspawn
Quote: the K700 beat the 6230 hands down in every aspect ecxept for expandable memory.
without the memory slot the K700 is already very disadvantaged compared to the 6230. i dont think anyone can truly believe when they say 41Mb is more than enough. (remember Bill of MS with his famous 640K memory comment)
i have nothing against K700. in fact both these phones (K700 and 6230) do not interest me. based on my own experience, something like 128Mb would be more appropriate for a phone with such capability.
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 15:25:29
Edit :
Quote
ayush, i always take 11 mp4 songs with me to the gym, plus the radio, and still have free space for other things...itīs perfectly enough...when i need more music (itīs rare), i use my proper mp3 player...but for normal everyday use, the 42mb are more than enough
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 15:27:45
Edit :
Quote
moto e398 sucks
i know a lot of ppl who hav it and they are suffering
the k7s cam is better
polyphonic ringtones suck on that phone (worse than the nokia 3100)
it has a lot of bluetooth conectivity probs
the only advantage are the speakers
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 15:36:29
Edit :
Quote
LUK THE k700 IS BETTER AT TAKING PICS THAN THE 6230 SURELY WE CAN FINALLY CONCLUDE THIS!. plus its a better fone, thts the end of tht really, nuff sed
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 15:40:51
Edit :
Quote
They are very similar phones, for people taking photos sure, the k700, but if you need a memory card then its got to be the 6230. And shouting your point across doesnt make us think you are any more right.
--
Posted: 2004-09-30 15:47:24
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
