>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson leads Nokia in 3G handset segment
Bookmark topic
On 2007-04-05 18:24:43, BobaFett wrote:
i get your point, but then how comes that samsung has 3 times more marketshare then se?
Last time I checked SE had around 7.5 and Samsung around 11.8% of the market share, which makes Samsung having around 1.5 times as big market share as SE, not 3 times.
While SEs market share and profit has increased for the last couple of years, Samsungs market share and profit has decreased.
All those figures are publically available on the net.
What does those figures tell you (who of those two makes phones pople want) ?
On 2007-04-05 18:24:43, BobaFett wrote:
samsung is following the nokia way, everyday a new fone, but look at se and again w880.
What's your point ? If the goal is to increase the market share and more importantly the profit, what difference does it make if Samsung has 70 models and SE 30 ? It has not helpt Samsung anyway, has it (see my reasoning above) ?
On 2007-04-05 18:24:43, BobaFett wrote:
they launch a fone, and focusing at features, less then a 2 years old model, k750... where is here the advantage and development?
K750 was a highend phone when it came out, most of SEs latest models are low and midrange phones. Nokias and Samsungs low and mid range phones arn't that great either and are not supposed to be considering the price tag.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2007-04-06 16:23 ]
--
Posted: 2007-04-06 17:20:22
Edit :
Quote
i wouldnt say that k750 was a high end fones, it remindede on the ericsson times, when i said wow, so many features in one fone. but then se launched k600, which was a big disapppointment for me, cos excpet to 3g, they gave us a very weak fone. so i am wondering, where se go wrong, that the 3g palette is really poor imo.
--
Posted: 2007-04-06 18:39:41
Edit :
Quote
In
Indonesia, by the end 2004 Nokia has had more than 80%, Samsung following with 9% only!
This year Nokia has almost 70% of market share. Following is SE with 18%, Samsung 8%, Motorola 7%, and the rest.
Still not anywhere close to Nokia.
But, there have been many mind sets changing of people of developed countries like Indonesia. 2 or 3 years ago, most of people here will think "NOKIA" everytime they planned to buy a cellphone. This time, many people will think likely "Nokia? Nuh... music is bad. Walkman is better." or "SE cam is better than Nokia.. I think I'll go with SE."
Nokia always takes advantage of developed countries like my country, when people are not smart enough to spend their money. The slogan of Nokia "Teknologi yang mengerti Anda" has been around many years. It means "Technology that understands you". For many years, Indonesian people just want something to be simple, like "I want the technology understands me. I don't want to learn anything else, or more." Now people are smarter. They want something new. They want to try something new. They want to buy something new. They want to be wiser in spending money. They know what they want.
_________________
The proud owner of K750i, S700i, and Z600.
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2007-04-06 19:13 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2007-04-06 19:14 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2007-04-06 19:16 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2007-04-06 19:17 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2007-04-06 19:20 ]
--
Posted: 2007-04-06 20:07:11
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-04-06 18:39:41, BobaFett wrote:
i wouldnt say that k750 was a high end fones
If that was not an SE high end phone, then what other SE phone by that time did you consider as highend ?
On 2007-04-06 18:39:41, BobaFett wrote:
where se go wrong, that the 3g palette is really poor imo.
Its easier to discuss if you could be a bit more specific. What exactly do you mean SE is missing in the 3G department that other manufacturers have ?
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2007-04-06 20:54 ]
--
Posted: 2007-04-06 21:51:42
Edit :
Quote
for a me a high end fonr is a smart fone. i miss mostly in 3g se fones edge support, which is a very important feature when it comes to no umts support in an area. i know its operator depending, if edge is given or not, but in the countries where i am the most, i do hated to have k600, k610 or k800 ate the moments, where no umts was offrered and i hade to "slow down" on gprs at browsing. so i took 6233 instead. imo k800 and k610 aswell , do had deserved edge.
--
Posted: 2007-04-06 22:01:21
Edit :
Quote
Do you still get countries and cellphones which use GPRS? LoL

I thought nowadays 3G and if not EDGE, is standard all over ! Ok ok my 7650 used gprs, but that was like 4, 5 years ago

. The N95 has 3.5G already and yes my network does support it !
--
Posted: 2007-04-07 04:49:45
Edit :
Quote
Residentevil Posts: > 500
Let's just hope they invest in good customer service.
--
Posted: 2007-04-07 04:56:44
Edit :
Quote
Operators here are not able to cope up with gprs, let alone 3G and edge...
--
Posted: 2007-04-07 05:04:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply