Esato Mobile
General discussions : Non mobile discussion : Harry will NOT serve in Iraq.
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Non mobile discussion > Harry will NOT serve in Iraq. Bookmark topic
Page <  1234

Xugaa Posts: > 500

^ Yeah that's what I was thinking, he wants to serve his country rightly as he should be able to, and if putting him in the frontline will increase the danger for our other soldiers, let him serve somewhere safer a bit further back. It doesn't in any way make what he's doing less important or giving him special treatment in anyway, no more than it does the other men and women doing them kinds of jobs.
--
Posted: 2007-05-17 20:10:12
Edit : Quote

axxxr Posts: > 500


On 2007-05-17 20:06:23, BobaFett wrote:
well, if they dont want him in the fireline, he would be great as a radio base, his ears are perfect as a radar... so he can sit all day long and move his head left and right



Best suggestion so far!

Maybe the Army general should consider this option.

On Topic: The Royals should have been sent to Iraq first before ordinary soldiers to set an example.

Every Mother who has lost a Son or Daughter in Iraq was her Prince or Princess....Harry should be given no special treatment in Iraq....he should be sent and thrown into combat just like any other soldier..If he dies then his father will know what it feels like to lose a son in a pointless war!


--
Posted: 2007-05-19 12:56:33
Edit : Quote

haynesycop Posts: > 500

I agree with some of your points but there have already been thousands of deaths, which is just awful. If they sent him over then him just being there would put people under more risk than they already are and would cost even more lives.
--
Posted: 2007-05-19 13:13:20
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

Personally I don't think a nations royalty should serve in the armed forces anyway. They should have figure head positions at most. It doesn't do to have royalty in the forces when their loss could be poor for morale or dangerous to their unit, or attract undue attention to military operations.

Long gone are the days of Richard the Lion Heart etc. It's not about Harry at that level, it's about the Nation as a whole.

btw, I don't agree with Britain having forces in Iraq, I'm just talking about the general principle of any nations royalty being involved with their combat forces.
_________________
File System Tweaks for the K750 K750 Tricks



[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2007-05-19 12:25 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-19 13:22:47
Edit : Quote

axxxr Posts: > 500

Well if the days of Richard the Lion heart have gone then don't you think that maybe its time that \"ROYALTY\" should be abolished aswell?


--
Posted: 2007-05-19 13:26:26
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500


On 2007-05-19 13:26:26, axxxr wrote:
Well if the days of Richard the Lion heart have gone then don't you think that maybe its time that "ROYALTY" should be abolished aswell?


Yes I do, but if a Nation still maintains royalty, it needs to keep them out of combat. Don't try and read any pro-royalty or pro-iraq war into my statements. I'm talking about pragmatism not politics.

Personally I think the Royalty are little more than a circus and war of any kind is obsolete as a way to resolve National interests.
--
Posted: 2007-05-19 13:38:13
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500


On 2007-05-16 20:00:54, BobaFett wrote:
actually NO british soldiers should go to iraq...

according harry and the royal family, they should go all and make themself useful, since 50 years they just stand on the balcony and wave with their hands from time to time...


totally agree with you. i dont get this royalty stuff, what is it that makes them special? is it something that they do or what?
also, British dont belong in Iraq in the first place, not everywhere is like the subcontinent where they can go and rule for centuries.
--
Posted: 2007-05-19 16:12:55
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

Agree totally. I couldn't care less what happens to Harry (other than my general human compassion for all people).

But if you do have your troops in a war zone, even if they shouldn't be there (which they shouldn't), I still wouldn't want to see them exposed to more danger just because some plum in his mouth prince wants to play war games.

Bring them all home I say.
--
Posted: 2007-05-19 16:49:57
Edit : Quote
Page <  1234

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home