>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> G900 or N82?
Bookmark topic
Wonderful N82 picture
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=13725
N82 is a good cameraphone, and probably the best out there, when the conditions are right, but in many cases you'll end up with phones like that because of Nokia's stupid image details processing software. If you've got lots of details, it'll get so messy that you can hardly look at it.
--
Posted: 2008-08-11 16:52:28
Edit :
Quote
There's also Nokia 6220 the cheap edition of N82.
http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone2=2177&idPhone1=2256
Pictures:
http://www.fony.sk/photos/nok[....]?dir=nokia_6220_classic&page=1[ This Message was edited by: cleary on 2008-08-11 16:38 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-11 17:37:02
Edit :
Quote
I go to N82:
Full and EXIF:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13757
Full and EXIF:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13758
--
Posted: 2008-08-11 17:40:47
Edit :
Quote
yeh. the black N82 looks light years better then Silver. (and yes, K850 was thick to.. but shorter though, N82 feels so tall and thick)
N82 is taller, thicker & wider, (its a big boy
N82; 112 x 50.2 x 17.3 mm
K850; 102 x 48 x 17 mm
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-11 17:13 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-11 18:11:18
Edit :
Quote
yes... big in every way ...
--
Posted: 2008-08-11 20:14:17
Edit :
Quote
DickySnapples Posts: > 500
id hardly call the N82 big,well apart from on features
--
Posted: 2008-08-11 22:59:08
Edit :
Quote
While the SE G900 is a beautiful mobile and smaller than the N82, the Nokia is by no means a "brick".
Some facts to consider:
N82: GSM Quad-band
G900: GSM Tri-band.
N82: Built-in GPS
G900: none
N82: EDGE - Yes
G900: EDGE - No
N82: HSCSD - Yes
G900: HSCSD - No
The N82 has significantly faster GPRS speed as well. No big deal if you're always on European 3G, but if you're not then the N82 is going to outperform. As for SE's lack of Quad-band, perhaps they're only concerned with Europe, but if you travel to the U.S. or Canada you performance on the G900 is going to be very mediocre.
--
Posted: 2008-08-11 23:25:23
Edit :
Quote
I haven't seen the black version of N82 (not apart from pics), so cant really say how different its from the silver one.
What I really want to know is whether there is a big gap in the differences between the phones in terms of camera quality and general usage, or are the differences only visible to a heavy user (excluding looks).
--
Posted: 2008-08-12 13:29:06
Edit :
Quote
Blindly the n82 its camera is the best till now, the symbian OS is better on nokia it is faster
--
Posted: 2008-08-13 03:18:16
Edit :
Quote
I would advise the G900......but I've got one. The N82 has more features like GPS and Xenon flash but it costs more and IS a bigger and heavier phone, you also have to remember the N82 has very stupid keys, read the reviews on it and every one mentions them, same stupid style as some SE phones, you either love it or hate it. The G900's keypad is great with lovely big keys that are easy to press. The D pad also makes UIQ very easy to use.
But it depends what you prioritise, stereo speakers, GPS, camera get the N82.
A useable keypad, slim nice style, great media player, better battery life, touch screen, torch function get the G900. The new touch focus and interface does make the G900's camera great to use.
The N82 is basically the N95 in a candybar.
--
Posted: 2008-08-13 04:02:50
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
