>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2011
Bookmark topic
LT28i with super low benchmark
http://sevodoi.blogspot.com/2[....]n-sony-ericsson-lt28i-ang.html
--
Posted: 2011-11-17 16:44:16
Edit :
Quote
I think I will never get it why people bother about
a) benchmarks in general, and
b) especially benchmarks of unreleased prototype phones
--
Posted: 2011-11-17 19:32:16
Edit :
Quote
1) Geeks care
. As if a geeky person is just going to look for a phone with a low bench. It is also one way for the company to sell their product. Since SE is failing in this department, fans will obviously try and ignore it. I know real life performance is more important, but real life performance is sort of linked to the benchmark of the phone.
2) Looking at benchmark of the prototype phone is like reading about myths, just take it as a pinch of salt. The benchmark will change, mostly higher, but it indicates how well the phone will do.
Take it as a pinch of salt, some people love looking at things like that, don't flame!
--
Posted: 2011-11-17 20:18:31
Edit :
Quote
Wasn't meant to be a flame. I just don't understand it
--
Posted: 2011-11-17 20:40:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-11-17 20:40:04, rog wrote:
Wasn't meant to be a flame. I just don't understand it
It actually didn't come across as though you were flaming, I thought it was a valid point about people's preoccupation with benchmarks on prototypes ignoring real world usage.
--
Posted: 2011-11-18 10:11:20
Edit :
Quote
Not bashing or anything but its funny how in the past 2 years Samsung and
have almost been opposite of each other.
Galaxy S/S2 best Android flagship unbeaten , ahead of competition. And
Xperia X10/Arc worst Android flagship outdated even before they launched. The trend looks to continue into 2012 with Galaxy S3/Nozomi
--
Posted: 2011-11-18 13:48:18
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-11-18 13:48:18, randomuser wrote:
Not bashing or anything but its funny how in the past 2 years Samsung and
have almost been opposite of each other.
Galaxy S/S2 best Android flagship unbeaten , ahead of competition. And
Xperia X10/Arc worst Android flagship outdated even before they launched. The trend looks to continue into 2012 with Galaxy S3/Nozomi
Not quite true, the Xpeira X10 and Galaxy S has pretty similar specs to each other and actually the X10 had a far better 8MP camera with flash, the S on the other hand only had 5MP. The only issue with the X10 was the low version of android (1.6) but SE have learnt from this mistake and are making up for it massively.
--
Posted: 2011-11-18 14:01:43
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-11-18 14:01:43, adsada wrote:
On 2011-11-18 13:48:18, randomuser wrote:
Not bashing or anything but its funny how in the past 2 years Samsung and
have almost been opposite of each other.
Galaxy S/S2 best Android flagship unbeaten , ahead of competition. And
Xperia X10/Arc worst Android flagship outdated even before they launched. The trend looks to continue into 2012 with Galaxy S3/Nozomi
Not quite true, the Xpeira X10 and Galaxy S has pretty similar specs to each other and actually the X10 had a far better 8MP camera with flash, the S on the other hand only had 5MP. The only issue with the X10 was the low version of android (1.6) but SE have learnt from this mistake and are making up for it massively.
Not really. Galaxy S hummingbird chipset was the best and most powerful single core CPU whereas X10 only had a first gen 1 ghz Qualcomm snapdragon. Galaxy S was the best and most powerful smartphone in 2010 and the X10 was the least desired flagship phone. Outdated OS version, 384mb RAM, 1st gen Snapdragon and a not so impressive screen.
Samsung hummingbird is the only single core CPU that can decode 1080p videos. And now the Exynos continues the legacy being the only dual core chipset currently that can playback 1080p web flash videos in the browser whereas all others including Nvidia Tegra2, Qualcomm 8260/8660, TI OMAP 4430/4460 struggle with even 720p. Even most netbooks cannot play 1080p flash videos.
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2011-11-18 14:21 ]
--
Posted: 2011-11-18 15:20:32
Edit :
Quote
On 2011-11-18 15:20:32, randomuser wrote:
On 2011-11-18 14:01:43, adsada wrote:
On 2011-11-18 13:48:18, randomuser wrote:
Not bashing or anything but its funny how in the past 2 years Samsung and
have almost been opposite of each other.
Galaxy S/S2 best Android flagship unbeaten , ahead of competition. And
Xperia X10/Arc worst Android flagship outdated even before they launched. The trend looks to continue into 2012 with Galaxy S3/Nozomi
Not quite true, the Xpeira X10 and Galaxy S has pretty similar specs to each other and actually the X10 had a far better 8MP camera with flash, the S on the other hand only had 5MP. The only issue with the X10 was the low version of android (1.6) but SE have learnt from this mistake and are making up for it massively.
Not really. Galaxy S hummingbird chipset was the best and most powerful single core CPU whereas X10 only had a first gen 1 ghz Qualcomm snapdragon. Galaxy S was the best and most powerful smartphone in 2010 and the X10 was the least desired flagship phone. Outdated OS version, 384mb RAM, 1st gen Snapdragon and a not so impressive screen.
Samsung hummingbird is the only single core CPU that can decode 1080p videos. And now the Exynos continues the legacy being the only dual core chipset currently that can playback 1080p web flash videos in the browser whereas all others including Nvidia Tegra2, Qualcomm 8260/8660, TI OMAP 4430/4460 struggle with even 720p. Even most netbooks cannot play 1080p flash videos.
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2011-11-18 14:21 ]
Yes, it's fact!
--
Posted: 2011-11-18 16:44:05
Edit :
Quote
Yes,galaxy S was a much better smartphone than xperia x10,however the reason is that it was developed 6 months after the x10.Let's not forget that xperia x10,had its specs finalized by June 2009,while Galaxy S started its development around Sep-Nov '09.Still the main reason x10 failed was its outdated version of Android,the initial lack of multitouch,and its uninspiring screen.Now,about xperia arc vs galaxy s2,their main difference was on the processor/ram,in a lot of areas it was a draw(camera,screen,connectivity),while in some other areas arc was better(design,ui).Plus,the arc costs around 100-120eur less than the s2.I just hope next year until sony takes over,
will use the latest processors available,and will not continue using older processors than competition.
--
Posted: 2011-11-18 17:36:47
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
