>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902
Bookmark topic
On 2008-05-20 05:50:16, >500 wrote:
ok the c902 produces very bad photos (going by these images), so im 'assuming'
have used a smaller/low quality unit as a result of the phone being 10mm thin.
The 6220classic is 15mm, so im also assuming the nokia has a larger/better quality (obviously judging from these pictures) unit
5mm is a lot in a phone, and im sure a better unit would have been used if the c902 were 15mm.
But its not, its 10mm, and now we have this shabby photo quality.
Life goes on...
ps. before anyone calls me a fanboy, im not defending
im just saying that this MAY be the cause of the poor image quality. I'd be saying the same if the results were the other way around.
_________________
May the
be with you!
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2008-05-20 04:52 ]
Wasnt C902 suppose to be the new camera high end from SE? If yes, then why would they make it thin to compromise picture quality?
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 08:15:36
Edit :
Quote
Because they have the idea that thin is in.
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 08:35:03
Edit :
Quote
@mib1800
so you're size has ABSOULTELY NOTHING to do with quality
okkkkkkkk........... the less space there is, the smaller the unit, you do realise that.
@qvga
good question
but yes it is a high end'ish phone i guess, though the flagship camera phone is still due to come this year of course. still, these photos are quite poor.
i leave my final judgement though until the final version is out and on the market, as i do with any other proto from any other companies.
god why did the 6220 have to be so ugly (my opinion) i may have bought one..... o well.
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 09:13:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-20 07:26:45, mib1800 wrote:
On 2008-05-20 05:50:16, >500 wrote:
The 6220classic is 15mm, so im also assuming the nokia has a larger/better quality (obviously judging from these pictures) unit
5mm is a lot in a phone, and im sure a better unit would have been used if the c902 were 15mm.
But its not, its 10mm, and now we have this shabby photo quality.
Life goes on...
You got it all wrong.
Bad picture is not due to thinness. It is just due to SE wants to maximise profit by including a cheap & crap sensor/lens in the C902 just like they did in all their recent and
future phones
you know everything about se future phones????
give me a break...
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 09:18:13
Edit :
Quote
what i see is very bad quality, however i still believe that final product will show us something much better. i like 6220 features but battery lifetime is disqualifying this phone from the use. so, relax everybody and give chance to SE
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 10:02:44
Edit :
Quote
the nokia 6220 won to the c902 :S
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 10:09:23
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-20 10:02:44, Raiderski wrote:
what i see is very bad quality, however i still believe that final product will show us something much better. i like 6220 features but battery lifetime is disqualifying this phone from the use. so, relax everybody and give chance to SE
Totally agree with this,
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 10:13:57
Edit :
Quote
This is from gsmarena preview of C902:
Unfortunately, the trademark red-to-pink conversion that all recent Sony Ericsson cameraphones manifest is still present here and judging from our experience it will be there in the final products too.
Link :
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_c902-review-223p3.php
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 10:19:57
Edit :
Quote
i thought 6220 is ugly... but sitting beside that remote control c902, 6220 suddenly looks good.
SE is just falling out. the once i loved company is no more.. cybershit is just icing in the cake, and i would not be surprise if the romours on downgrading x1 is also real.
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 10:43:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-20 10:19:57, Rifqi_Aziz wrote:
This is from gsmarena preview of C902:
Unfortunately, the trademark red-to-pink conversion that all recent Sony Ericsson cameraphones manifest is still present here and judging from our experience it will be there in the final products too.
Link :
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_c902-review-223p3.php
And the paragraph above the one you quoted reads:
"Judging the camera quality of a beta unit is a risky business. Even so, it's clear the C902 camera is a capable shooter. The images are crisp with nice detail. Noise level is relatively low, especially with sufficient light. The autofocus camera does very well at close-ups. Color rendering is relatively good; yet all colors are a bit cold. We think they need some 10-15% more saturation to ride high."
Well guess what... some contrast and saturation tweaks could be all that's needed, and those are things that firmware can deal to... lets wait for the retail version eh?
--
Posted: 2008-05-20 11:13:30
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
