Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Which SE phones ( to date ) has the best antennae reception quality?
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Which SE phones ( to date ) has the best antennae reception quality?
Bookmark topic
Residentevil Posts: > 500
@Richlok. that is, because ATT/Cingular overlays the 850 band with the 1900 band, but the 850 is better quality and reaches farther.
--
Posted: 2004-07-02 21:33:12
Edit :
Quote
I guess with no contention the '96 Ericsson R ? - Satellite Phone is truly one of the best, having great antenna reception
--
Posted: 2004-07-02 21:48:00
Edit :
Quote
I have had a T68i, A T610 and now a K700.
* T68i - No good signal receiver.
* T610 - Same bad signal receiver.
* K700 - Good signal receiver.
In the basement of the company I work i got no signal at all with the T68i and the T610.
With my new K700 I have yet to find a place where I will get no signal!
--
Posted: 2004-07-02 21:55:01
Edit :
Quote
I guess with this aspect, we can evidently see what fone has the best antenna reception if we are to compare fone models with internal-built antennas to that of which do have external-built antennas
From my experience, I can say that the fones which I had then and now which have external antennas gives better coverage reception (signal), also to consider it's transfer calls!
--
Posted: 2004-07-02 22:44:01
Edit :
Quote
I ve tried almost all ericssons from 388 and after.Best signal definately K700i and a T610 i 've had with the very latest firmware.Worst for me was my P800 unfortunately and maybe some early t68
--
Posted: 2004-07-02 23:26:31
Edit :
Quote
@ ResidentEvil: Yeah, but I don't go into AT&T's current 850mhz band in LA. I'm strictly (Cingular) 1900mhz until the deal is done. The T616 is also a 850/1900mhz phone but it's RF was crappy. If I could pick up AT&T's 850mhz band in the West, my screen will show up as 'Cingular Extend'. It never has. AT&T did strike a deal to use our Network out here (hence their 'doubled' up coverage).
--
Posted: 2004-07-02 23:35:25
Edit :
Quote
I've used SE phones T68i and T610, and Ericsson T39 for the past four years at uni and have come to expect where reception is really bad. However got a samsung c100 as a birthday present a few months ago and have been unexpectedly surprised at how much better the reception was than the SE phones in places of low reception. The other day, i was stuck on the underground in one of the stations and my c100 went off- i chatted for almost half an hour without any drop in signal. Previously my SE phones wouldnt even have registered a single bar. Pity the c100 is nothing compared to the SEs in other departments!
--
Posted: 2004-07-02 23:47:00
Edit :
Quote
i just got a brand new unlocked se T637 branded for cingular but am using it on T-Mobile's network. it has by far the BEST reception of signal out of any motorola i've owned (V300, V330, V600) and the ericsson t39m i have as a back-up phone. i'm on the west coast (california) in the US.
--
Posted: 2005-11-15 12:44:29
Edit :
Quote
my k750i hold on to its signal like a pitbull with its jaws locked onto some guys ball sack!
--
Posted: 2005-11-15 13:12:02
Edit :
Quote
I must say that I can confirm the notoriously good reception with the k700 - if connections drop, it's always because the other end of the line has trouble - better than most phones I can compare with. I suppose the K750/W800 will be as good or even better. Has anyone yet compared these two?
--
Posted: 2005-11-15 13:20:20
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
