News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Non mobile discussion > This is a sad day for the international community Bookmark topic

At least during the first Gulf War, Bush (the father) respected the United Nations decisions... the Bush junior is nothing more than a filthy pig who violates the International Law and he should face punishment.

They did tried to brainwash us, by saying that we are in danger by Sadams Mass Destruction weapons... but wait a minute? What weapons? We do know very well that this country was under embargo during the last 10 years... and even the UN inspections didn't find anything at all.

Furthermore what makes America and UK more safe to have NUKES??? What makes them better than Saddam???
They already proved that their nothing more than common murderers... by slautering people during the first Gulf war and denying medicines for more than 10 years to the citizens of a heavily striken country.

I wouldn't be surprised if someday in the future Osama would strike again... it would be a normal reaction!!!

I am not saying that Saddam is a holly man. He is also guilty for trying to invade another country... but this time there is absolutely NO reason for this invasion.

This invasion aims to:
1) Control the oil supplies
2) Achieve a political/economic strike to Europe (since Europe is supplied with oil from Iraq... so you can imagine why oil price is sky high) (America is not affected since they don't any "oil relations" with Iraq)
3) Just to tell the world "who is the boss"
4) And test the new weapons...


Finally, at least for Europe, many political parties will not be elected again as it appears... because they did ignore their peoples voice (Thats for Blair and Athnar)
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 19:27:00
Edit : Quote


Intelligent debate is ending and resorting to personal attacks and bullshit comments now so have fun. Was good while it lasted. This message was posted from a P800
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 19:48:00
Edit : Quote


questions you won't find in Trivial Pursuit...

1) Which is the only country in the world to have dropped bombs on over
twenty different countries since 1945?

2) Which is the only country to have used nuclear weapons?

3) Which country was responsible for a car bomb which killed 80 civilians
in Beirut in 1985, in a botched assassination attempt, thereby making it
the most lethal terrorist bombing in modern Middle East history?

4) Which country's illegal bombing of Libya in 1986 was described by the UN
Legal Committee as a "classic case" of terrorism?

5) Which country rejected the order of the International Court of
Justice (ICJ) to terminate its "unlawful use of force" against
Nicaragua in 1986, and then vetoed a UN Security Council resolution
calling on all states to observe international law?

6) Which country was accused by a UN-sponsored truth commission of
providing "direct and indirect support" for "acts of genocide"
against the Mayan Indians in Guatemala during the 1980s?

7) Which country unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile
(ABM) Treaty in December 2001?

Which country renounced the efforts to negotiate a verification
process for the Biological Weapons Convention and brought an
international conference on the matter to a halt in July 2001?

9) Which country prevented the United Nations from curbing the gun
trade at a small arms conference in July 2001?

10) Aside from Somalia, which is the only other country in the world to
have refused to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child?

11) Which is the only Western country which allows the death penalty to
be applied to children?

12) Which is the only G7 country to have refused to sign the 1997 Mine
Ban Treaty, forbidding the use of landmines?

13) Which is the only G7 country to have voted against the creation of
the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 1998?

14) Which was the only other country to join with Israel in opposing a
1987 General Assembly resolution condemning international terrorism?

15) Which country refuses to fully pay its debts to the United Nations
yet reserves its right to veto United Nations resolutions?


...just take a guess..one guess
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 20:10:00
Edit : Quote


@ sulfuriq, salaam brother i agree with u 100%

--
Posted: 2003-03-20 20:12:00
Edit : Quote


@psikey yeah! The war begun n we're worrying about being nuke! Saddam is totally nutcase n Bush is not? Is it ok to bomb Iraq but not ok being bomb? Is that justice? Yeah why not kill all the people in the world? War die n burn! This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 20:15:00
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2003-03-20 20:10, senninha wrote:
questions you won't find in Trivial Pursuit...
...just take a guess..one guess



The US?
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 20:17:00
Edit : Quote


@jbendaou

right u are...
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 20:20:00
Edit : Quote


@ senin n wonder why they're like that eh? This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 20:31:00
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2003-03-20 20:15, sulfuriq wrote:
@psikey yeah! The war begun n we're worrying about being nuke! Saddam is totally nutcase n Bush is not? Is it ok to bomb Iraq but not ok being bomb? Is that justice? Yeah why not kill all the people in the world? War die n burn!



This message was posted from a T68i


But the bombing that the US is doing is not the same as the bombing Iraq would do if they have the chance. US are trying to take out strategic targets like Saddam and his cabinet and also Military targets. Give saddam half a chance and he will bomb civilians on purpose. The guy is a nutter and needs to be stopped.
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 20:43:00
Edit : Quote


Quote:
But the bombing that the US is doing is not the same as the bombing Iraq would do if they have the chance. US are trying to take out strategic targets like Saddam and his cabinet and also Military targets. Give saddam half a chance and he will bomb civilians on purpose. The guy is a nutter and needs to be stopped.

Can you explain to me why would the US destroy a building where a minister of information has his office in???what good is it gonna do?
I really dont get it...i ll understand if they destroy radars,etc...but a Building complex in the middle of the city, just because it has an office where minister makes fone calls,etc...???
--
Posted: 2003-03-20 21:02:00
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index