>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SE vs Nokia
Bookmark topic
look: either way, NO MATTER what you argue, you'll still get dickheads buying Nokia phones. so rather than trying to prove that SE phones are better than Nokia's to some Nazi bastard on these forums, why not try to enlighten your friends/family to the virtues of a SE phone.
--
Posted: 2003-04-11 15:14:00
Edit :
Quote
Where did u get that information bout the 7250 having a 5 mb memory capacity? Are u out of ur mind? 7250 has only 725kb space for its memory. It's even smaller than what the se t68i has.
This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2003-04-11 15:37:00
Edit :
Quote
Well I've seen the phone in action and it does have WHOPPIN' 5 MB memory. Nokia has the tendensy to be real sloppy on there web-site. .
--
Posted: 2003-04-11 16:13:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-04-10 09:41, d' fuhrer wrote:
at least when you upgrade the Sw on a nokia it all goes away not unlike a SE phone which i experienced personally.
Are you sure? I had an 8310 before and it didn't have snowboard game so I sent it to a nokia service center for an upgrade and when I got it back, my phone started crashing several times a day... After 2,5 months I sold (sorry, got rid of it) and bought a 68i... I still have r2a and it doesn't have any problems at all - it didn't even crash once since I bought it...
--
Posted: 2003-04-11 16:24:00
Edit :
Quote
@diggy, are you saying that Symbian OS 6.1 is better that Symbian OS 7?
I own both Nokia 3650 and SE P800, both has the same 640x480, 24bit camera-picture quality.
--
Posted: 2003-04-11 18:20:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-04-11 09:29, jkirimis wrote:
Is someone trying to say that those blury pictures of 3650-7650 are better than those of MCA-20 and T610? or it's just my imagination?
In terms of Symbian OS... I will let the P800 users to explain why UIQ is more powerful than the Series 60.
[ This Message was edited by: jkirimis on 2003-04-11 08:33 ]
Who cares how good the pics on the mca 20 are, they look like a pile of shit on the screen. Most pictures taken by phones will be viewed on the phone and therefore this addition was a waste to the t68 as its screen is the worst colour one out now. You havent used a t610 so dont comment and it is blatenetly obvious that the 3650 and 7650 do not take blurry pics unless u have spasms when u take urs.
--
Posted: 2003-04-11 23:47:00
Edit :
Quote
Have you even seen the pictures taken by a 7650? There were about 10 threads here comparing the 7650 to the MCA-20, and in every case the 7650 lost because the 7650 camera is SHIT.
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 00:38:00
Edit :
Quote
Bla bla bla... I have SEEN the photos that T610 gets... and YES they are of better quality!!!
Oh, and please BE FAIR... the t68 is a 2 years old phone.... and do not try to change the subject! We were talking about Picture Quality, and YES MCA-20 KICK ASS you either like it or not.
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 01:55:00
Edit :
Quote
i like the nokia 3650, its a nice phone and has alot of features and i must say that its a cheap orternative to a P800, just to clear some things up the 3650 does have bluetooth audio and data send/receive
and the 7250 does also have 5mb of memory (very nice nokia) but it lacks in alot of places its 2 mm thicker then the 7210 and the T610 is smaller then the 7250 & the 7210. but only has 2mb memory and so games and apps and pictures wont be stay in the phone for long, but it makes up for this with bluetooth, 65K screen and screensavers, the 7250 dont even got screen savers!
i must say that if i had to chose between the T610 (that i tried at Cebit) or the 3650 (that my friend has) i would take the 3650,
but if i had to chose between the T610 and nokia 7250 id take the T610 simply because of bluetooth size of the screen, and a 65K screen over the 7250s 5mb memory the T610 is way more powerful
i am a bit sick of nokia not makeing there high end phones with bluetooth but my P800 has it, and so i can still share pics with friends who all seem to buy nokias since you can change the face plates,
in the end nokias will allways be bought buy the young people since the unlimeted personalisation that can go on with a nokia phone, if u want a logo for a SE phone u have to look high and low if u want a logo for a nokia... theres adds everywhere in mags in tv guides on internet pop-ups, on TV adds and ringtones, if u look at the market at the moment nokia are doing the best around the world and so i just dont think they care if they make good phones or not.
when i had my 8310 i had alot of problems with that it was allways crashing and even now after 3 firmware udates i still cant get into the top score menu in snowbored (i can highlight the top score menu but if i click the select butten nothing happens), when i bought my t68 i had none of these problems and when i upgraded the firmware to t68i i was very happy to find i had 8 games! (no java but who cares about that when it came out?)
nokia will never make phones as good as SE, but they just dont need to with all the people that are buying nokias. SE are going under but the P800 (there flag ship model if u will) is selling faster then they can be made and so SE are slowly crawling up the ladder and nokia will be soon looking over its sholder at both companys (sony & ericsson) helping each other to get to the top of the mobile phone plato!
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 05:04:00
Edit :
Quote
this is stupid
another example of a person using his own assumption as fact
T610 cam res is only 352x288, which is a quarter VGA compared to the VGA in 7650,P800,3650
i do hope that SE fanatics spread worldwide, but not blindly and just comment on something without even understanding the products commented in detail, SE is great, and there's must be a solid reason, SE doesn't need some enthuastic fans putting false info just to support its products
duh.....
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 05:09:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
