>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> W800 not so great anymore?
Bookmark topic
read my post again Ahdam
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 21:42:06
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-04-27 21:26:34, Ahdam wrote:
how can u think the w800i is better than N91? as its obviously not .
obviously on paper the n91 is better, it has a 4gb hard drive which means no need for any memory sticks which at the moment only go up to 2gb.
The n91 also has much more features than the w800.It is also has 3g.
I am a sony ericsson fan but u cannot deny for once nokia have come up with in my eyes a stone cold killa in the music phone market.
Is The n91 a smartphone?and if so wat version of symbian will it run on?
Also i would rather pay and xtra 100 euros for a better phone by far.
Well, N91 is announced at 800 EUR, it's a little bit more than the extra 100 EUR you're willing to pay
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 21:44:46
Edit :
Quote
but when we are at it here is the specs:
N N91
Standard battery, Li-Ion (BL-5C) 900 mAh
Stand-by Up to 190 h
Talk time Up to 4 h
SE W800
Standard battery, Li-Ion 900 mAh
Stand-by Up to 400 h
Talk time Up to 9 h
But as I stated in my last post... try and decide cuz this is just paper specs
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 21:45:57
Edit :
Quote
ok, nokia will probaly make another battery which lasts longer.
I have not got anything against se but this time round i think its nokias time to shine in the limelight.
i know the nokias slightly bigger and heavier, but remember its 61 g is all made up for because of the 4gb hard drive.
obviously the battery life does matter but on paper if u look at all the technical specs the n91 wins by a mile.
Anyone give me the price in pounds?
[ This Message was edited by: Ahdam on 2005-04-27 20:56 ]
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 21:55:24
Edit :
Quote
Phonewars 3 - Revange of the Nokia. Thats all I can say.
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 22:04:57
Edit :
Quote
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 22:07:41
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-04-27 21:55:24, Ahdam wrote:
ok, nokia will probaly make another battery which lasts longer.
Sure and add even more to the weight.
Quote:
On 2005-04-27 21:55:24, Ahdam wrote:
I have not got anything against se but this time round i think its nokias time to shine in the limelight.
The phones are definitely impressive.
Quote:
On 2005-04-27 21:55:24, Ahdam wrote:
i know the nokias slightly bigger and heavier, but remember its 61 g is all made up for because of the 4gb hard drive.
Its much heavier and bigger (in the world of mobile phones, g and mm does a lot). This why I find a built in HD to bee a bad idea. It adds alot to the weight, consumes more power, moving parts makes it more fragile and its slower than a modern flash based memory.
Quote:
On 2005-04-27 21:55:24, Ahdam wrote:
obviously the battery life does matter but on paper if u look at all the technical specs the n91 wins by a mile.
No doubt.
Quote:
On 2005-04-27 21:55:24, Ahdam wrote:
Anyone give me the price in pounds?
Around 550 GBP.
Those are definitely no massmarket phones.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2005-04-27 21:17 ]
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 22:09:53
Edit :
Quote
and the w800i was £300 wasnt it so the n91 is quite a bit more expensive than the w800i.
hmmmm
which shall i get?
wat about release dates for the n91
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 22:14:57
Edit :
Quote
And you can probably get a K750 for around 270 GBP. N90 is scheduled for Q2 and N91 for end of this year (Q4).
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2005-04-27 21:21 ]
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 22:19:20
Edit :
Quote
SE have chosen the correct technology for the W800, by using solid state memory sticks! Mobile phones are every day tools and go through a lot of abuse. The hard drive used in the Nokia N91 is a complex mechanical system that uses fragile old fashioned magnetic disks made of glass for storage !!! I will not be replacing my Ipod with an ugly & expensive phone with a puny 4GB HDD!
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2005-04-27 23:10:35
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
