News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Nokia 3250 VS. Sony Ericsson K750i(W800i) Bookmark topic

Quote:
On 2005-10-03 15:25:03, Arez wrote:
Quote:@mib1800

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fact is, if you do a side-by-side comparison of functionalities, the 3250 is ahead

Here we go again: these are things that matter a lot for me and other people - price, looks&style, size, weight, sound quality, photo quality, battery

Mr Mib1800, does the 3250 have a better performance in this aspects than the k750??? Go ahed, answer it...

This symbsonites don´t give up, they wanna convert all people to their nerdy cult by force


[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-10-03 14:28 ]


it quite hard to compare the aspects youve brought up as the phone hasnt been released so it may or maynot be a better music player than the k750/w800 or it may or maynot have a better camera.
till its tested to say those features are worse is a little unfair.

--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:03:48
Edit : Quote


if the camera is not the same as n90, nokia´s flagship camera, and doesn´t have autofocus+macro, it´s obvious its gonna be worse than k750´s, you don´t have to be a genius to figure that

wanna bet???

Quote: I am only trying to show the good side of 3250 same as what you are trying to do for the K750/W800.

mate, if you´d do just that, i wouldn´t argue so much with you...the problem it´s that normally your attitude is "this s60 device (no matter which) is much better than k750/w800"

You do that every time there is a new s60 device from nokia...

Obviously i know there are good points in 3250, but k750 still has some advantages over it for a lot of people, that you seem to forget

[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-10-03 15:36 ]
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:12:17
Edit : Quote


well thats like saying that the k600 has a 1.3mp camera so it must be as good as the the s700 which it isnt.
i m not saying its going to be better but until its released or at least available for test its very hard to say it better or worse.
same with the music player past experinece would say it wont be as good, but you have to judge each product on its own individual merits or lack of.
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:16:14
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2005-10-03 16:16:14, slattery69 wrote:
well thats like saying that the k600 has a 1.3mp camera so it must be as good as the the s700 which it isnt.



Speaking of which, minus the specs on the camera numbers, I think that the S700i and K750i's pic resolution/sharpness/quality are just one and the very same !
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:23:35
Edit : Quote


well that just goes to show you cant just look at figures alone you have to see examples in the flesh.
if we just looked at what companies had done in the past, prior to the s700 who would have though se could make a camera phone that could actually take a picture , as the t610/630 were terrible compared to other phones at the time.
i might be in the minority but i like to judge things based on real world experience not just a spec sheet and press release alone and that goes for all companies
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:28:59
Edit : Quote


@slattery69 - Exacto mundo mate ! Now, all we need here is a member who owns a Nokia 3250, and let him/her tell his/her stories about it, specially with that of it's camera's quality.
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:37:00
Edit : Quote


@slattery69, there´s a thing called logic:

1. for 3250´s camera to be better than k750´s, it would have to be better than the heavily priced carl zeiss branded n90 camera, that is known to produce almost the same quality of k750 in terms of photos

2. It´s known that 3250´s camera won´t have autofocus

3. most probably 3250 camera is gonna be the same than 6280´s. There are already samples of that one - it´s clearly worse than k750´s

Is it enough????




_________________
k750i + hbh 600 + hpm 70

http://pbase.com/ares - photography by ares aka antonioj

[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-10-03 15:42 ]
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:40:26
Edit : Quote


Couldn't agree more with you, mates, yet we know there will still be those blowing hot air... ermm hot text, i meant. Fact is that theory is wonderful, but the practical often fails to impress. However, betcha anything some members will keep on slanging it, even should it prove to be superior to certain other models. This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:44:45
Edit : Quote


@arez
yes there is a think called logic and that involves waiting till a phone is out to try it before make claims that its crap.
yes you may very well be 100% correct in what you are saying.
but i like to see things working than just reading a spec sheet.
i remember people saying that the camera on the 6630 would be crap before it was released yet when it came out it was as good if not better in point and click mode than the s700
the s700 only was a better camera in the hands of people who knew how to tweak the numerous setting to create a far better picture.
time will tell but saying that just cause nokias recent camera phones havent been good doesnt mean this one isnt, in the same way as i said earlier prior to the s700 se couldnt make a decent camera phone but i think we can all agree that, thats changed some what now.


[ This Message was edited by: slattery69 on 2005-10-03 16:07 ]
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 16:50:46
Edit : Quote


@max, a correction. Sony's isnt the first digital music player - the philips digital audio cassette was -but minidisc was the 1st portable. Also the first home cd game console was the Sega Jaguar or even the older than that Sega had a cd/cartridge console. Sony still makes great products but music arm is failing badly to the ipod.
--
Posted: 2005-10-03 18:44:22
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index