>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K750i vs Sharp 903
Bookmark topic
All u can eat quality pics by 903.
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=858406
--
Posted: 2006-03-02 09:26:12
Edit :
Quote
I still dont rate the camera as very impressive.
Having said that, of the specimen K800i pictures ive seen, 3.2mp size, i dont rate them all that impressive either..
--
Posted: 2006-03-02 18:41:41
Edit :
Quote
O2 we also can show you equally impressive images taken by k750 owners...
I said the 903 is (was) the best, but the difference between it and k750 isn´t so bug like you seem to think...
--
Posted: 2006-03-02 18:53:38
Edit :
Quote
It is buddy. Try taking a real macro picture with a k750 and print it in A4 format and you'll quickly see the limitations of a 'toy' camera. (The macro mode as defined by the photographic fraternity and not SE fans - i.e. finished product on paper shows a object X x bigger then object photographed ! ) Even the mighty N90 has trouble with a real macro but I'll say comes closest to the real thing - that was till the 903 come on the scene. Even the promissed 3.2mp SE cells will battle to surpass the 903 because they only have digital zoom :-( I am asking again, what lens does the 903 use and for the technicaly mindet, how does it solve the problem of focal length to focusing distance in such a limited space ? Remember the N90 uses the whole with of the cell ! Does it uses a liquid lens or it bends the light by 90deg ? If so does it with a mirror or prism ? Who manufacture the prism system ? How come there is not a hint of chroma diffraction? And please don't guess the answers. Thanks :-)
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650
--
Posted: 2006-03-02 19:22:24
Edit :
Quote
i'm not much into camera sharpness but i would definitely pick the 903 over the k750 for the killer looks of the 903. the k750 looks sad imo.
--
Posted: 2006-03-02 19:49:00
Edit :
Quote
It's not a fair test to compare a 2mp with a 3mp. To put it in perspective a 3mp picture is 50% bigger than a 2mp picture. They're both good camera phones in their own right!
--
Posted: 2006-03-03 11:37:49
Edit :
Quote
Yeah, i would pick the 903 if it was sized 50% of what it is...get real, its a f... brick!!!! For that is better to carry proper camera + phone...duh
Mario, please stop you´re ignorance...what do you expect from printing an A4 from a 2mp photo file, no matter what type of camera you used???
SE phones do have proper macro...
--
Posted: 2006-03-03 11:48:15
Edit :
Quote
@mario when will u please stop talking about the N90? Even the 6280 is better than that crappy cameraphone...
--
Posted: 2006-03-03 15:09:31
Edit :
Quote
lol I think the D750i is crap look at how it takes pics of my work compared to my Samsung D600
D750i/K750i
Samsung D600
--
Posted: 2006-03-04 02:54:43
Edit :
Quote
@Arez
oooo..... -7.2 degrees... how i wish my area has that kind of weather.. down here is always tropicana.... uber hot n sweaty.
anyways... back on the topic.. I believe 903 is currently the top in camera quality... near digital camera quality juz not there yet... N90 is out of the game... 2nd best would be the K750... if the 903 takes in 2MP size.. it will still beat the K750... coz we're looking at quality.. talking about Video... 903 takes the best video still.... K750/N90 are way way far off.... that i can say for sure.
--
Posted: 2006-03-04 07:01:54
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
