>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SE vs Nokia
Bookmark topic
So, you are not believing me that the Nokia 7250 has that very small 725 KB MEMORY ONLY ha? Then see for yourself, go to this link then choose nokia as manufacturer then select the phone you are worshiping. My gosh. This is the very first time that I met someone who believes that nokia is greater than SE.
http://www.gsmarena.com
There you go, that is the site. 7250 for your information is only an upgraded 7210. Its resolution is disgusting to the max. Wala siyang pinag-iba sa 6100 na ubod ng labo. I will really say that my NOkia 5100 is greater than that one. The only difference is that 7250 has its camera built in but that won't convince me to buy that phone.
Regarding the 3650. Yeah, its memory which they say is external (but is actually internal because it is beneath the battery) is huge like of what the P800 has but the phone is not as good as what you are thinking.
Kung sakaling ang T68i e naging 4096 colors lang that can play full track midi, hindi na ako maghahanap pa ng iba dahil kayang kaya na nitong talunin in its own way lahat ng future phones ng Nokia.
Back to 7250 again, I want you to be informed that the polyphonic tone that the Nokia 7250 can play is not different from what the 7210,6610,6100 and 5100 can play.
About this SE t610, if it will be realeased at reasonable price, I will get one but for the moment, I will just stick to my phones at the moment. Regarding the camera of 7650, yes, the 3650's camera is greater in terms of camera compared to 7650, also the 3650 has a real one player for streaming videos. But come to think of it, where will you use such things? To learn the steps of asereje? Don't make me laugh. I didn't buy phones to replace the functions of my pc. I just did for comfortable communication and that's it. But in terms of technology since it is the root of this thread, SE wins. That's it
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 05:57:00
Edit :
Quote
ive actuly holded a nokia 7250 and i can say that it has 5mb memory only 4 mb is free when bought but i dont care who you think u are because ive actuly held one
look at this review!
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/nokia-7250-en.shtml and scroll down about the middle and read IT clearly says
"The phone has a memory pool of 4 Mb. It can be shared between many applications, so, theoretically, you can save up to 180 photos of high quality and 400 photos of standard quality"
so if u dont know dont comment!! even esato gets info wronge about there phones so dont exspect lazy specs to be corect u need a puplic review to know and ive actuly held one and taken pics with it.
and theres also a screen shot of the memory pool down the bottem so beat that piss head!
_________________
a proud owner of nokia 5146/3210/3310/3330/8210/8310/7210 siemens S35/sl45(upgrade firmware to Sl45i)
sonyericsson t68/t68i/another=t68(with upgrade firmware to t68i)/p800
AND SOON T610!
and HBH-60!! YAY YAY YAY
[ This Message was edited by: jamatjam on 2003-04-12 05:11 ]
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 06:06:00
Edit :
Quote
mostro_musica sent me a private msg which i think i will post for all you to see:
hey there mister, I did not post there for fight. Did you visit the site I am talking about? Well that is my basis of that one and I do not just post to public places without due knowledge of the thing being post by me. Ok. Nokia, in their sites says that, that phone of yours has a 3.5 memory pool being shared by the pictures and files being put there. So, better to shut that mouth ofyoursn for that thing I have post is not my mistake because I only read it to that site. Now, if that information is not correct to what is really true, then be polite in correcting errors. Another thing, visit the site of your manufacturer or even call an assistant there. Please prove then to me that your phone really has 5MB Memory (Not 4, not 3.5 but 5) The site for your information is
http://www.nokia.com
Next time, please be respectful, everyone commits mistake and even you commit one. So, don't blame me for correcting you for you need to be corrected.
___________________________________________
and all i can say is that i dont need to prove anything to you since i know the truth and i dont own a 7250 i said i tryed one you dumb ass! and the simple fact of the matter is i know it has a large memory pool im not saying its better then then the T610 i loved the T610 when i tried it at cebit clearly SE has more features then the nokia phones do.
and about respect u show me some and ile show you some if u havnt got the facts dont tell other people what you dont know!
and i did go to nokia.com and found the stuff that was needed so u said it has 725kb well even nokia says it has 3.5mb memory and the site i have says 4mb with a screen shot the simple reason nokia are saying its 3.5mb is because they have to include all lang packs when they add there specs to there site when u buy the phone u will have about 6 - 7 lang packs but the nokia site shows the memory after holding 32 lang packs all at once
and if u would like even more evidence go to:
http://www.mobiledia.com/reviews/nokia/7250/page3.html
and again scroll down to the bit that says storage and read. They say it has 5MB of internal memory
_________________
a proud owner of nokia 5146/3210/3310/3330/8210/8310/7210 siemens S35/sl45(upgrade firmware to Sl45i)
sonyericsson t68/t68i/another=t68(with upgrade firmware to t68i)/p800
AND SOON T610!
and HBH-60!! YAY YAY YAY
[ This Message was edited by: jamatjam on 2003-04-12 07:35 ]
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 06:50:00
Edit :
Quote
yeah t610 is pretty good.. but its nowhere 2 be found! btw, whats its screen resolution?
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 07:04:00
Edit :
Quote
STN 65K display, which has a resolution of 128x160 pixels.
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 07:08:00
Edit :
Quote
65536 TFT screen display; 128 x 160 pixels.. sweet
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 07:09:00
Edit :
Quote
it is not a TFT display its a STN display
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 07:10:00
Edit :
Quote
i have no clue! there could be an ever-going argument on this. i just read howard chui's review (he actually got to test it..duh!
) and he clearly states that it is a tft screen..
who cares..
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 07:14:00
Edit :
Quote
well im afraid we cant determon which it is then! since _mobile-review says its STN and howard says its TFT i trust both sites and so i guess we cannot tell hmmm i think since howard chui only had a few minutes with it he could be wronge but theres no way of telling mobile-review could be wronge aswell? maybe the usa version users a TFT screen it is possible
--
Posted: 2003-04-12 07:21:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-04-11 15:14, KasaR wrote:
look: either way, NO MATTER what you argue, you'll still get dickheads buying Nokia phones. so rather than trying to prove that SE phones are better than Nokia's to some Nazi bastard on these forums, why not try to enlighten your friends/family to the virtues of a SE phone.
Could not agree more, m8.
--
Posted: 2003-04-14 08:26:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
