>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K750i vs Sharp 903
Bookmark topic
SE have always lagged behind in video quality.
--
Posted: 2006-03-05 21:18:42
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-03-03 11:48:15, Arez wrote:
Yeah, i would pick the 903 if it was sized 50% of what it is...get real, its a f... brick!!!! For that is better to carry proper camera + phone...duh
Mario, please stop you´re ignorance...what do you expect from printing an A4 from a 2mp photo file, no matter what type of camera you used???
SE phones do have proper macro...
Huh buddy, you certaily don't know much about camera lenses and testing thereoff
. I am not going to go into that, needless to say - problems are spoted easier when magnified ! And yes photos of acceptable quality can be printed from a 2mp cam even in A4 format if all the components are top quality ! Did you know that NASA's Mars Rovers are using a 1mp cam only for the 'detailed' imaging ? ( With a $100000 lens in front of the 1 mp CCD) And no, the 'macro' function on a k 750i is more marketing hype then usefull. Only the N90 has a more or less acceptable macro function ! Why I bother about macro ? Because it pushes the focusing system to the limit and at the limit one can spot defects easier - if you remember the last few words only from all of the above, then you have learned something today.
Greetings from South Africa. Mario
--
Posted: 2006-03-12 10:15:30
Edit :
Quote
so you're comparing normal consumer cameras with something from nasa? you're even dumber than i thought...anyone with a minimum knowledge about digital photography knows 2mp is not acceptable for a4 with ANY camera. Saying k750 macro mode is useless, despite proof of the opposite, just show how you're just a provocative mindless nokia fanboy
--
Posted: 2006-03-12 17:01:40
Edit :
Quote
N90 has a proper macro? Then what's this?
--
Posted: 2006-03-12 18:03:31
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-03-12 17:01:40, Arez wrote:
so you're comparing normal consumer cameras with something from nasa? you're even dumber than i thought...anyone with a minimum knowledge about digital photography knows 2mp is not acceptable for a4 with ANY camera. Saying k750 macro mode is useless, despite proof of the opposite, just show how you're just a provocative mindless nokia fanboy
Actually I am a 'Gin Bolero - 'fanboy'
I like the name fanboy. It makes me feel joung again
You can call me watever you please - as long as Nokia's share price goes up (They've broke thru 20USD the day before yesterday)
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=NOK&t=1y&l=off&z=l&q=l&c= .I've already ordered my N80 - in efect Nokia pay for it. Greetings from South Africa. Mario
--
Posted: 2006-03-12 18:40:51
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-03-04 02:54:43, miss uk wrote:
lol I think the D750i is crap look at how it takes pics of my work compared to my Samsung D600
D750i/K750i
Samsung D600
you have to wait for the square to go green before you snap the pic
--
Posted: 2006-03-12 19:17:22
Edit :
Quote
That doesn´t prove anything...the d750 photo is not focused, and shows really bad work from whom was taking the photo
Mario, how about answering to the real deal???
--
Posted: 2006-03-13 10:30:35
Edit :
Quote
top is w900, bottom is d600 (have to admit one thing--the d600 i have no to do these quick sample shots is a lot better then the d600 i had back in november-must have changed the hardware or firmware)
_________________
Shaolinmonk on HOFO Official PHONE JUNKIE
MyProfile
http://www.howardforums.com/m[....]s=&action=getinfo&userid=20841
[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2006-03-17 15:31 ]
[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2006-03-17 15:42 ]
--
Posted: 2006-03-17 16:27:37
Edit :
Quote
sharp vs k750i
just a few quick point and shoot shots...
--
Posted: 2006-03-22 16:14:39
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
