Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : K850i camera vs G800
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > K850i camera vs G800 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 789 ... 111213>

Waspinator Posts: 115

What's on the dinner table plankgatan
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 14:56:07
Edit : Quote

Laxen Posts: 27


On 2008-01-05 14:47:43, numb wrote:

On 2008-01-05 13:21:52, plankgatan wrote:
HAVE THE WHOLE WORLD GOING MAD ?????????????

K850 DOSE NOT PRODUCE THIS KIND OF 100% CRAPPY PICTURES...HE HE HE...ITS JUST SILLY TO SEE THIS PICTURES.....END OF STORY


Oh really ?

Heres the proof

http://spawnweb.dk/k850/DSC00081.JPG

http://spawnweb.dk/k850/DSC00087.JPG

Check the exif data on the original unedited pics and tell me again that they are not produced by the k850



What? Is it you who taken this pictures? They really suck, I got a K850 and it produce MUCH better pictures than that. Just look att the K850 thread. My Old W550i produced that kind of picture that you post.
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 14:57:16
Edit : Quote

JaffaTB Posts: 85

mine takes such low quality photos too....what build is your phone? mine is a 07W40, whats yours?
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 15:01:07
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

once again
i dont care if the whole world want to buy G800...

i shouldnt buy G800...it take worse pics then k850.....nearly all pics ive seen on Flickr.com looks blurry.

if you want a good camera phone....here is my advice:

1.
N82

2.
k850 or Viewty

when a G800 can produce this quality i buy it



_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 14:06 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 15:03:56
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500


On 2008-01-05 14:23:41, plankgatan wrote:
whatever...........

just look at the k850 thread or go to Flickr.com.....its more people then myself who get good pictures...

my old cid36 k750 manage good sharp outdoor pictures....nothing more

k750 indoor, "flash" & low light pics looks terrible.


K750 takes great low light pictures with the camera light which is stronger than the K800 flash so therefore you can take pictures further away than K800, but without using 400 iso giving terrible water colour edges to the picture as in K800. Many K800 flash pictures are completely useless unless resized to less than 2MP equivalent. Maybe K850 is better than K800, but there is nothing wrong with K750 low light pics.

Pictures of night scenes, where flash or light are useless, come out very good if you under-expose slightly - this eliminates the K750 white lines problem. I have many awesome K750 night shots.

btw don't think that just because your phone is good that all are the same. Even on the K750 I saw wide variety of quality of camera modules, even to the extent of swapping camera modules from one phone to another and seeing a change in quality of the pictures as a result. So I think it's perfectly feasible that some people have dodgy cameras. No need to accuse people of making it up or of being bad photographers.
_________________
File System Tweaks for the K750 K750 Tricks
K800 Tips and Themes
Max's K800 Page

[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2008-01-05 15:07 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 15:57:49
Edit : Quote

Vipera ammodytes Posts: > 500

numb thanks for full res. pictures

plankgatan always post resized pictures with editing!

when you gonna stop posting porsche photo??

that photo is so much pinkish
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 17:39:04
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

????????....when will you and some other people understand THAT ESATO AUTOMATIC SHRINK ALL PICTURES TO 800 X 600....OK

if you want to post full size pics here on the forum, you must use ex Imageshack, etc...or post them in the Photo section.

and YES, i post full size pics when i feel for it, (its realy boring job the work with imgaeshack..thats why i dont bother).....but for you i post some from the k850 thread


http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/450/dsc07060jg3.jpg


http://img84.imageshack.us/im[....]2/2106420500587dc887ddoxw5.jpg


http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8682/dsc06376be2.jpg


http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/8356/dsc06478ie7.jpg


http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg


http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/3712/dsc06435qp9.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 17:04 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 17:55:48
Edit : Quote

kenoby Posts: 407

I really do not want to get into discussion, but I just want to repeat my previous post:

@ numb, can you please try to hard reset the phone and make reflash before that? (backup first:) )

Then try to make few pics and post them..

I am really sorry you feel crossed over cause of the "crappy phone". I have one and to be honest, it impressed me. Especially for the New Year when I was taking the photos it made me very happy making good, quality photos. I am not an expert, and I let phone do everything automatically. Also I have first time bought an SE phone (well, I had some looong time before, but not relevant.) I also had N95 and I feel this phone is better, comparing the cams.
(I really do not want to piss off any Nokia fan here, it is just my personal believe, I also have N95 8Gb)

Here are my photos, all in auto, with both N95 and K850i, scroll to the middle:

http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=156144&start=1560


And, again, I do not want to sound biased, but now I personally like K850i over N95. I will post also some pics from the New Year's eve. And please, make rflash, it doesn't cost you a thing.

And we so went off topic....



[ This Message was edited by: kenoby on 2008-01-05 17:00 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 17:58:06
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500


On 2008-01-05 17:39:04, Vipera ammodytes wrote:
numb thanks for full res. pictures

plankgatan always post resized pictures with editing!

when you gonna stop posting porsche photo??

that photo is so much pinkish



sorry for the double post...i cant erase the first post..
----------------------------------------------------------------

????????....when will you and some other people understand THAT ESATO AUTOMATIC SHRINK ALL PICTURES TO 800 X 600....OK

if you want to post full size pics here on the forum, you must use ex Imageshack, etc...or post them in the Photo section.

and YES, i post full size pics when i feel for it, (its realy boring job the work with imgaeshack..thats why i dont bother).....but for you i post some from the k850 thread


http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/450/dsc07060jg3.jpg


http://img84.imageshack.us/im[....]2/2106420500587dc887ddoxw5.jpg


http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8682/dsc06376be2.jpg


http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/8356/dsc06478ie7.jpg


http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg


http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/3712/dsc06435qp9.jpg

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 17:09 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 18:05:30
Edit : Quote

JaffaTB Posts: 85

can everybody who is getting crappy pics please post the build of their phone, mine is 07w40, it could be the first models that were crap?
--
Posted: 2008-01-05 18:33:45
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 789 ... 111213>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home