>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Has SE really lost it?
Bookmark topic
Nokia has no fun and downloads on their web, like se has. In their magazine they adv wallpapers for payment. Tiny things, but it would be a nice support.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 16:47:06
Edit :
Quote
@slattery69
Good point. I do exclusively buy SE, but that's because I think their products are better than anyone else's. I didn't buy the P910 though, I jut didn't feel it was a worthwhile upgrade for me as I already have a P900.
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 16:52:44
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-10-30 16:47:06, bobafett wrote:
Nokia has no fun and downloads on their web, like se has. In their magazine they adv wallpapers for payment. Tiny things, but it would be a nice support.
This message was posted from a T68i
is nt most of the stuff thats free in the fun and downloads section just what came on the phone (or should have come on the phone denpending on what the operators remove and add).most of the games etc are for purchase.
i guess its personal opinion if you feel se offer you more then they probably do, if you feel they offer the same then they do. like a lot of things and its been mentioned by others before its a lot of subjectivity
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 17:01:08
Edit :
Quote
@slattery69
I agree with you; after all, why do we buy anything? Subjectivity, each person has different tastes.
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 17:04:06
Edit :
Quote
@scotsboyuk:
well u said it. people r waiting to buy smartphone. it doesnt matter whether they are diehard fans or otherwise. this is how things are. u come out with something to satisfy certain needs then someone will buy. Some people also say T610 is a crappy phone just like what what boba and ori said about 6600. But that doesnt change the fact these 2 are very successful models.
@ori
u can say whatever u want but the reality is Nokia smartphone is outselling everyone else. if the P900 is so desired, then maybe SE should be king of smartphone but it is not. Nokia making hellish phone? imo, every manufacturers are guilty of this sometime or other. Making money of brand. Of course. What do u think Sony is doing or SE is doing with the "S" part of its name.
@bobafett
If u don't take care of ur customers, then there is no return business. Nokia has tasted this bitter pill last years when they did not listen to customers demand. Ericsson paid a dear price for not listening. So now, Nokia is winning back some customers so it means that they are doing something which is palatable to customers. So is SE doing the same? Maybe not as much as is needed given the moaning in Esato (the bastion of SE fans) that SE is not introducing or renewing its product range.
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 17:05:19
Edit :
Quote
@mib i visited once usually the /// helpdesks and that was that i call support. Hope se will do the same service support and helpful assistance in the next future aswell as once /// did. Ps: i dont remember to mention that 6600 is a crappy fone.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 17:17:08
Edit :
Quote
@bobafett
Quote: i dont remember to mention that 6600 is a crappy fone.
oops. misread ur post. sorry about that.
btw: since I had the 6600, I never have need to visit any Nokia helpdesk. don't know whether this is bad or not.
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2004-10-30 17:57 ]
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 18:51:36
Edit :
Quote
@mib no prob. I mentioned the desk cos thex were in every of them very helpful, never payed for upgrade, service etc i liked the feeling to be served and supported with many useful infos of right usage of fones.
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 19:02:30
Edit :
Quote
2 months. thats how long i'm giving SE the chance to show us/me that they are still on track.
i know i'm one of the biggest SE /// fans but i've got my limits. if SE isn't on track anymore, then i'm affraid i'll have to let my intrests in SE go.
and i'm sure i'm not the only one here feeling this way
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 19:25:29
Edit :
Quote
@bart
Two months? Why that particarly short length of time?
--
Posted: 2004-10-30 19:35:28
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
