>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> wich cam is better? K700 or 6230?
Bookmark topic
I just took those yesterday...
http://gamer.agent55.com/k7006230/
I think that the 6230 is a bit better than the k700, and the video-recording of k700 just sucks... I was about to change my 6230 to k700, but now I really don't know...
--
Posted: 2004-11-21 20:40:46
Edit :
Quote
k700 is much much better
--
Posted: 2004-11-21 20:49:35
Edit :
Quote
TheRealSpawn Posts: > 500
Quote:
On 2004-11-21 20:40:46, len wrote:
I just took those yesterday...
http://gamer.agent55.com/k7006230/
I think that the 6230 is a bit better than the k700, and the video-recording of k700 just sucks... I was about to change my 6230 to k700, but now I really don't know...
We've allready established many times before that the 6230 takes better pictures in poor lightingconditions - while the k700 takes the best pictures under optimum lightingconditions. All your pictures do, is confirm that - which is no surprise.
About videorecording - you are talking nonsense - the nokia 6230 records video at maximum resolution of 128x96 at 12fps and max 4minuttes - the K700 records video at resolution 176x144 at 15fps and up to 40 minuttes (or up to available memory) and quality is as fine as can be expected - after all its not a professional DV videocam.
Poor quality of pictures or video - are more often caused by a poor photographer than by a poor camera.
heres an example of K700 videocamrecording - if you feel your nokia can do better - then please post an example.
http://spawnweb.dk/vids/klip2.3gp
Furthermore when it comes to playback of video - the nokia only play video at 128x96 pixels 12fps with very very poor AMR audio and max total bitrate of 90kbit/s - while the K700 can play video at 176x144 pixels 15fps with highquality AAC stereroaudio and max total bitrate of 160kbit/s which makes for instance musicvideos (and everything else) alot more interesting on K700 than on 6230
compare these 2 examples of how video looks and sounds on nokia vs k700
http://spawn.dk/test/K700.mp4
http://spawn.dk/test/6230.3gp
K700 simply trashes the 6230 in this department - I wouldent waste a second watching any video in 6230 quality
[ This Message was edited by: TheRealSpawn on 2004-11-21 21:33 ]
--
Posted: 2004-11-21 22:14:27
Edit :
Quote
Good one.
This message was posted from a T310
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 02:32:33
Edit :
Quote
@therealspawn
come on, 160kbps max for the video playback isn't enough, buddy. the k700i can play any mp4 videos in the bitrate of more than 520kbps. LOL. 6230 is far far far worse.
anyway, can i add?
video recording in 6230 is not good since the sounds recorded isn't as cleared as k700i. k700i records sounds in a video so well..
bout the camera, i would say that 6230 is without any doubt better than any k700i when taking pictures in incandescent mode or in a place with low light condition. yes, it's blurry but still better than any k700i taken pics. but, when you go outdoor, in some good lightning condition, k700i will take pics LOT better than any 6230. trust me.. it's sharper and more colorful.
_________________
The proud owner of S700i, K700i, and Z600.
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2004-11-22 04:28 ]
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 05:24:18
Edit :
Quote
If people just take the time to really read the contents of a thread, we wouldn't have to keep repeating these same arguments over and over.
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 05:38:24
Edit :
Quote
About nokia..i have used phones which were equiped with VGA to 1 megapixel cameras but they all SUCK bcos the pic is blury and the colours in the photo taken by nokia camera phones dont match the subject!
But K700i has an overall excellent camera bcos it takes sharp and colourful images with proper lighting. For me the most important thing I look for in a camera is how sharp it takes the photo and the pic has to have the exact colours of the subject. Btw people always dont take pics in the night! Even though the nokia do better in night shot the biggest prob is in daylight the images are crap...
The point is we take photos mostly in good lighting and if those photos are not good whats the point in having a phone that takes only good pics in the night.
K700i is LOT better.
[ This Message was edited by: vijith555 on 2004-11-22 08:27 ]
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 09:24:51
Edit :
Quote
gadget-freak vampires?
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 09:26:46
Edit :
Quote
I have to say the best camera phone nokia has ever done so far is 6630..I just checked the sample shots and they are sharp and colourful..thats the first time both those qualities came in a Nokia phone.
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 09:39:43
Edit :
Quote
It seems that(almost) everybody in this forum are "die-hard" Sony Ericsson followers so it seems hard to get an objective view on this...
On the pictures I took with the Sony Ericsson K700i (that I borrowed from a friend), it seems that the jpg-compression is much higher and and the pictures is about half the byte size than the ones of the Nokia. Maybe the jpg-compression can be set on the k700, thus making images with higher quality possible.
Maybe I should add that I am _not_ a Nokia nor SE hardcore person, I just want the best available camera in my next Phone...
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 10:36:31
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
