Sony Ericsson / Sony : Symbian phones : Visual communication like never before with the Sony Ericsson Satio
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> Visual communication like never before with the Sony Ericsson Satio
Bookmark topic
Good comparison, Domipost. And a nice review, clear and simple.
I like it that way.
--
Posted: 2009-10-06 23:38:15
Edit :
Quote
Much as i love SonyEricsson i am actually starting to doubt weather they actually really do make the better camera phones or not.
--
Posted: 2009-10-06 23:48:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-10-06 23:48:00, Bonovox wrote:
Much as i love SonyEricsson i am actually starting to doubt weather they actually really do make the better camera phones or not.
http://
http://sandeepmurali.shutterfly.com/satio/81
Camera test: Satio vs Nikon D70S vs Sony Cybershot W180 vs Xperia X1i.
You be the judge.
[ This Message was edited by: synn on 2009-10-07 02:34 ]
--
Posted: 2009-10-07 03:32:00
Edit :
Quote
I'm not buying those photo comparison anymore cause I've got the Innov8 which had been praised for the pic quality and yet and I'm not satisfied with the result.
[ This Message was edited by: titus1 on 2009-10-07 03:46 ]
--
Posted: 2009-10-07 04:14:31
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-10-06 21:35:51, Saka wrote:
The star is back on Swedish
site. Guess no launch this week...
Too bad
katshing.se said that they will get satio in stock 16th october.
--
Posted: 2009-10-07 09:38:40
Edit :
Quote
As i expected pixon12 beats satio in details, but haven't you guys notice purple fringing on its samples?
And btw. i'm surprised at how Satio manages to pull a very decent fight against pixon. as i saw its first proto samples, the noise reduction is kicking too much details indication that it will be another C905 vs Innov8 vs Renoir scenario wherein C905 ranked last and worst. but on sandeep's blog we clearly see how Satio's Exmor beats W180's CCD in sharpness and detail. and i think the reason why Satio has underexposed output is because its lens is made of plastic! have they used Sony lens-G or any other sharper alternative lenses then it can pull a win.
--
Posted: 2009-10-07 10:46:48
Edit :
Quote
Lens is so important. If they only made it a little bigger and out of real glass.
Had a 1.2MP canon digicam that beated every early cheap 5MP cams.
--
Posted: 2009-10-07 11:04:53
Edit :
Quote
see this magnificent photos
http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/?prod_id=3303&tid=4262414
--
Posted: 2009-10-07 11:38:55
Edit :
Quote
i think the reason why Satio has underexposed output is because its lens is made of plastic! have they used Sony lens-G or any other sharper alternative lenses then it can pull a win.
It has nothing to do with the type of lens. It's a classic exposure trick to avoid getting the highlights blown out. Even Nikon DSLRs do the same.
The Minolta (G) lenses are some of the purest glass known to man and even a tiny one for the satio would cost as much as the phone itself. Even the so called "Carl-Zeiss" lenses in Nokia phones are nothing but branded pieces of plastic.
--
Posted: 2009-10-07 11:41:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-10-06 22:25:33, McKinley wrote:
Samsung Pixon12 is the clear winner
I wouldn't go too far as to say it's the 'clear' winner. I think Satio gave Pixon a good fight and won some of those shots where Pixon looked overexposed and over saturated. Plus it's not a final retail unit and packs the bare essentials of a good imaging device, so it's probably a matter of getting it ready for the consumers and perhaps some cam version updates after that. I'm not the least bit disappointed tbh
--
Posted: 2009-10-07 11:54:34
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
