>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902
Bookmark topic
Did you actually look at the photos in this link? They're clearly of a much higher quality than those on the first page of this thread.
--
Posted: 2008-05-21 13:30:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-21 13:30:20, dualist wrote:
Did you actually look at the photos in this link? They're clearly of a much higher quality than those on the first page of this thread.
Its impossible to tell the pictures quality, as they are only at 800x600 resolution.
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 02:52:09
Edit :
Quote
theres an option to download original size
click on all sizes, then you have option to download original size
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 03:54:14
Edit :
Quote
Original size is 800*600.It seems all of Virgile's pics are re-sized to 800*600.
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 05:07:22
Edit :
Quote
here you go again ... another comparison fight
but then I just don't feel nokia 6220 look nice.... picture yes...beat C902 but the outlook ....is like
Hard for me to choose it since a phone to me beside having all this multimedia features will be its look.
Since like it or not phone is meant for you to show your personality these days.... but that Nokia just don;t suit me
i guess from jan 2008 till now...only 6600 fold impressed me on its look but tht too remind me of Motorola v8088.
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 07:34:19
Edit :
Quote
6220 also has a little thing called VGA at 30FPS video + AGPS
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 09:12:34
Edit :
Quote
well i just have one small question...............Can we hope that Shiho will be a REAL Cybershot phone and not just a camera that doesent deserve the name?
And yes I've tested the C902 and the picture quality is not as good as the K850 and the small sensor buttons are really annoying.6220 is a cheaper interface of the N82 ,so i'm not surprised on the fact that is producing better quality photos than the C902.
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 10:14:26
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-22 02:52:09, Radiux399 wrote:
Its impossible to tell the pictures quality, as they are only at 800x600 resolution.
Picture quality is not just about how many megapixels you have - it's about colour reproduction, contrast, detail, etc.
These photos might only be 800x600 but they are quite obviously far superior to the ones at the start of this thread, i.e. proof that new firmware can make a big difference.
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 14:13:35
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-20 07:26:45, mib1800 wrote:
On 2008-05-20 05:50:16, >500 wrote:
The 6220classic is 15mm, so im also assuming the nokia has a larger/better quality (obviously judging from these pictures) unit
5mm is a lot in a phone, and im sure a better unit would have been used if the c902 were 15mm.
But its not, its 10mm, and now we have this shabby photo quality.
Life goes on...
You got it all wrong.
Bad picture is not due to thinness. It is just due to SE wants to maximise profit by including a cheap & crap sensor/lens in the C902 just like they did in all their recent and future phones
you are hillarious
Do you think that you can put a big sensor in a 10 mm phone? if you think so, then there is something wrong with you
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 14:21:32
Edit :
Quote
I only hope that this model had a problem and they won't release the phone in these conditions because it would be really ridiculous... Some of the photos seem to be worse than with every 1mpx phone...
--
Posted: 2008-05-22 16:53:05
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
