>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> wich cam is better? K700 or 6230?
Bookmark topic
Hello Len...
Even though nokia has less compression on the pics taken whats the use..its still blury and less colourful..Jpeg compression has nothing to do with the overall pic quality.
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 10:42:36
Edit :
Quote
Quote:Jpeg compression has nothing to do with the overall pic quality.
I can assure you that Jpeg compression has everything to do with the quality of the image, as jpeg is a destructive compression format. Do you mean that it is impossible to change the jpeg-quality on the k700?
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 11:05:31
Edit :
Quote
Ofcourse in the K700i there are two settings for taking photos one is Fine quality and other is Normal..In fine quality the images are better than that of normal and in fine the byte size of image is more.
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 11:11:29
Edit :
Quote
K700i has 2 compression settings - Normal and Fine. Average size of VGA image at Fine is 70KB; Normal occupies about half.
But even in Normal compression the quality is still better than in 6230 IMO. The only degradation I can find between the two settings is basically pixelation - not color quality.
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 11:12:01
Edit :
Quote
anyway, have you guys forgot the panorama mode?
it's only available in k700i.
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 12:25:24
Edit :
Quote
...if that would be the case....se k700i has the better camera
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 12:30:50
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-11-22 10:42:36, vijith555 wrote:
Hello Len...
Even though nokia has less compression on the pics taken whats the use..its still blury and less colourful..Jpeg compression has nothing to do with the overall pic quality.
You bet it sure does.
That is the reason why true photographers don't want to take photos in jpeg-format. They prefer uncompressed images and that is the reason why RAW-format exist. Colours are accurate to 100% whereas compressed is a bit lower than that.
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 12:43:25
Edit :
Quote
Over-all, the
K700i wins in the cam (slightly) and screen resolution comparison datas . . .
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 12:46:09
Edit :
Quote
What I meant earlier is that the jpeg compression on K700i is not that much that spoil the pics taken by it. I do agree that Jpeg comression reduces the quality of the image but i tried to tell that K700i has a good jpeg compression.
Bottom line is K700i has a better camera and it competes with any camera in its range.
[ This Message was edited by: vijith555 on 2004-11-22 19:55 ]
--
Posted: 2004-11-22 20:51:09
Edit :
Quote
I thought we already established that long time ago.
--
Posted: 2004-11-23 01:23:45
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
